Literature DB >> 12943623

Postoperative chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

M Tachibana1, H Yoshimura, S Kinugasa, M Shibakita, D K Dhar, S Ueda, T Fujii, N Nagasue.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neither postoperative radiotherapy nor chemotherapy alone provided a survival benefit after curative esophagectomy for esophageal squamous carcinoma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Of 103 consecutive patients who underwent potentially curative esophagectomy for esophageal squamous carcinoma, 45 patients with advanced cancers without preoperative adjuvant treatments were prospectively randomized to two groups; postoperative chemotherapy alone (Group A, n=23) and postoperative radio/chemotherapy (Group B, n=22). In Group A, cisplatin (CDDP) (50 mg/m(2)) was given by intravenous infusion on days 1 and 15, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (300 mg/m(2)) was given daily by continuous intravenous infusion for 5 weeks. In Group B, in addition to the same chemotherapeutic regimen of Group A, 50 Gy of radiotherapy was given to the mediastinum over 5 weeks. The immunohistochemical staining of tumoral p53 and microvessel density was undertaken to correlate to the radio/chemosensitivity.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the clinicopathologic characteristics between the two groups. The median dose of 5-FU and CDDP administered were not significantly different between the two groups. The mean (SD) dose of radiotherapy in Group B was 42+10 Gy. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates in Group A were 100, 63 and 38% and those in Group B were 80, 58 and 50%, respectively (P=0.97). In each group, four patients succumbed to locoregional recurrences. Tumoral p53 was immunohistochemically negative in 43% in Group A and 77% in Group B (P=0.03), indicating that many patients in Group B might be potentially sensitive to radiochemotherapy. The 3- and 5-year survival rates (75 and 64%) of patients with p53 negative expression (n=18) were significantly (P=0.03) better than those with p53 positive expression (n=27, 44 and 26%). The long-term survival was better for patients with p53 negative tumours than those with p53 positive tumours in Group B (P=0.06 by long-rank test, P<0.05 by Generalized-Wilcoxon test). However, the long-term survival was not different between the patients who had p53 negative and positive tumours in Group A (P=0.19). These data suggest that there were no survival advantage for patients receiving radiotherapy in Group B, instead p53 negative tumours appeared to have a favorable prognosis.
CONCLUSION: Postoperative radiotherapy administered concurrently with chemotherapy does not provide a survival benefit compared with chemotherapy alone. Tumoral p53 expression has a predictive value for survival in patients treated with postoperative radio/chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12943623     DOI: 10.1016/s0748-7983(03)00111-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  18 in total

1.  Clinical fate of T0N1 esophageal cancer: results from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Caitlin Takahashi; Ravi Shridhar; Jamie Huston; Kenneth Meredith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-10

2.  Adjuvant radiation therapy and lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer: a SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Ravi Shridhar; Jill Weber; Sarah E Hoffe; Khaldoun Almhanna; Richard Karl; Kenneth Meredith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Perioperative therapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Makoto Yamasaki; Hiroshi Miyata; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Yukinori Kurokawa; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Shuji Takiguchi; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-07-29

Review 4.  Perioperative management of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Alicia Okines; Bhupinder Sharma; David Cunningham
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Optimal therapeutic strategies for resectable oesophageal or oesophagogastric junction cancer.

Authors:  Branislav Bystricky; Alicia F C Okines; David Cunningham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Possible refinement of the standard treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Cheng-Che Tu; Po-Kuei Hsu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Curative treatment of esophageal cancer; an evidenced based review.

Authors:  Ravi Shridhar; Reza Imani-Shikhabadi; Bonnie Davis; Oscar A Streeter; Charles R Thomas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2013-12

Review 8.  (Neo)adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy is Beneficial to the Long-term Survival of Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zixian Jin; Dong Chen; Meng Chen; Chunguo Wang; Bo Zhang; Jian Zhang; Chengchu Zhu; Jianfei Shen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-09-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Clinical usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the restaging of esophageal cancer after surgical resection and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Long Sun; Xin-Hui Su; Yong-Song Guan; Wei-Ming Pan; Zuo-Ming Luo; Ji-Hong Wei; Long Zhao; Hua Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant treatment: which one is better for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?

Authors:  Yaping Xu; Xinmin Yu; Qixun Chen; Weimin Mao
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.