Literature DB >> 12943317

Case studies on biological treatment of tannery effluents in India.

Vinod Tare1, Sandeep Gupta, Purnendu Bose.   

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative assessment of the cost and quality of treatment of tannery wastewater in India by two common effluent treatment plants (CETPs) constructed for two tannery clusters, at Jajmau (Kanpur) and at Unnao in the state of Uttar Pradesh, India. The Jajmau plant is upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) process-based, while the Unnao plant is activated sludge process (ASP)-based. Investigations indicated that the ASP-based plant was superior in all respects. Total annualized costs, including capital and operation and maintenance costs, for the UASB and ASP plants were Rs. 4.24 million/million liters per day (MLD) and Rs. 3.36 million/MLD, respectively. Land requirements for the two CETPs were 1.4 hectares/MLD and 0.95 hectares/ MLD, respectively. Moreover, the treated UASB effluent had higher biochemical and chemical oxygen demand (BOD/ COD) and considerable amounts of other undesirable constituents, like chromium (Cr) and sulfide, as compared with the ASP effluent, which had lower BOD/COD and negligible concentration of sulfide and Cr. Sludge production from the UASB-based plant was also higher at 1.4 t/day/MLD, in comparison to the sludge production of 0.8 t/day/MLD for the ASP-based plant. Also, the entire sludge produced in the UASB-based plant was Cr-contaminated and, hence, hazardous, while only a small fraction of the sludge produced in the ASP-based plant was similarly contaminated. The results of this study are at variance with the conventional wisdom of the superiority of anaerobic processes for tannery wastewater treatment in tropical developing countries like India.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12943317     DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2003.10466250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  7 in total

1.  Efficiency assessment of Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) treating tannery effluents.

Authors:  Pramod W Ramteke; S Awasthi; T Srinath; Babu Joseph
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Policy framework for formulating environmental management strategy for sustainable development of tanneries in India.

Authors:  Kapilkumar N Ingle; Koichi Harada; Chang Nian Wei; Keiko Minamoto; Atsushi Ueda
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 3.674

3.  Effect of tannery effluent on oxidative status of brain structures and liver of rodents.

Authors:  Felipe Dos Santos Moysés; Karine Bertoldi; Viviane Rostirola Elsner; Laura Reck Cechinel; Carla Basso; Simone Stülp; Marco Antônio Siqueira Rodrigues; Ionara Rodrigues Siqueira
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Effects of tannery wastewater exposure on adult Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Felipe Dos Santos Moysés; Karine Bertoldi; Gisele Lovatel; Sabrina Vaz; Kelly Ferreira; Juliana Junqueira; Pamela Brambilla Bagatini; Marco Antônio Siqueira Rodrigues; Léder Leal Xavier; Ionara Rodrigues Siqueira
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  An eco-friendly method for short term preservation of skins/hides using Semecarpus anacardium nut extract.

Authors:  Kuttalam Iyappan; Thangavel Ponrasu; Vilvanathan Sangeethapriya; Vinaya Subramani Gayathri; Lonchin Suguna
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Kinetic, equilibrium isotherm and thermodynamic studies of Cr(VI) adsorption onto low-cost adsorbent developed from peanut shell activated with phosphoric acid.

Authors:  Zeid A ALOthman; Mu Naushad; Rahmat Ali
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Taguchi Method and Response Surface Methodology in the Treatment of Highly Contaminated Tannery Wastewater Using Commercial Potassium Ferrate.

Authors:  Violetta Kozik; Krzysztof Barbusinski; Maciej Thomas; Agnieszka Sroda; Josef Jampilek; Aleksander Sochanik; Adam Smolinski; Andrzej Bak
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.