Literature DB >> 12942554

Widening disparity in survival between white and African-American patients with breast carcinoma treated in the U. S. Department of Defense Healthcare system.

Ismail Jatoi1, Heiko Becher, Charles R Leake.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the U. S., age-adjusted breast carcinoma mortality rates among white and African-American women have been diverging during the last 20 years. Some investigators speculate that the widening disparity is due to inequalities in access to healthcare, with African Americans having less access to necessary healthcare and improved therapies. Others argue that differences in tumor biology or some extrinsic influences on cancer etiology and behavior may account for the widening disparity. To examine this issue further, the authors compared trends in survival among white and African-American women diagnosed with breast carcinoma in the U. S. Department of Defense (DoD), an equal access healthcare system.
METHODS: The medical records of all women diagnosed with primary breast carcinoma between 1980-1999 were retrieved from the U. S. DoD Automated Central Tumor Registry (ACTUR). Variables selected for further analysis were date of diagnosis, date of birth, vital status and date of death if applicable, race (black, white, and others), and stage of tumor. Because the database does not contain causes of death, overall survival was investigated. The effect of year of diagnosis and race on overall survival was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model stratified by age at diagnosis (1-year age groups). Calculations were performed separately by disease stage for all stages combined and stratified by stage. Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software package SAS.
RESULTS: After deleting observations with missing or implausible information regarding patient age, gender, and follow-up time, the final dataset was comprised of 23,612 women with primary breast carcinoma. The survival of African-American women compared with white women demonstrated an increasing ratio with calendar period. Although the hazard ratio was 1.269 for women diagnosed with breast carcinoma during the calendar period 1980-1984, it increased to 1.849 for those diagnosed between 1995-1999, which is a ratio of 1.46. For this period, the interaction between race and period was found to be significant (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study demonstrated that breast carcinoma survival rates among white and African-American patients, adjusted for age and stage, are diverging in the U. S. DoD healthcare system. Thus, inequalities in access to healthcare most likely are not solely responsible for the widening racial disparities in outcome reported among women diagnosed with breast carcinoma. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12942554     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  45 in total

1.  Black and white patients fare equally well when treated with postlumpectomy radiotherapy.

Authors:  Stuart H Burri; Jerome C Landry; H James Norton; Lawrence W Davis
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Racial variation in tumor stage at diagnosis among Department of Defense beneficiaries.

Authors:  Lindsey Enewold; Jing Zhou; Katherine A McGlynn; Susan S Devesa; Craig D Shriver; John F Potter; Shelia H Zahm; Kangmin Zhu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Racial comparison of outcomes and costs for inpatient neutropenic patients: a multicenter evaluation.

Authors:  Susannah E Motl; Katie J Suda; John C Kuth; Thomas J Gladney
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Racial disparities and trends in radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer in women, 1992 to 2002.

Authors:  L Du Xianglin; Beverly J Gor
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.847

5.  Racial/ethnic differences in the relative risk of receipt of specific treatment among men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kelvin A Moses; Heather Orom; Alicia Brasel; Jacquelyne Gaddy; Willie Underwood
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.498

6.  Breast cancer treatment delays by socioeconomic and health care access latent classes in Black and White women.

Authors:  Marc A Emerson; Yvonne M Golightly; Allison E Aiello; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Xianming Tan; Ugwuji Maduekwe; Marian Johnson-Thompson; Andrew F Olshan; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Racial/ethnic disparities in knowledge about risks and benefits of breast cancer treatment: does it matter where you go?

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Angela Fagerlin; Nancy K Janz; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Does race affect outcomes in triple negative breast cancer?

Authors:  Jasgit C Sachdev; Saira Ahmed; Muhammad M Mirza; Aamer Farooq; Lori Kronish; Mohammad Jahanzeb
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2010-05-07

9.  Triple-negative breast cancers are increased in black women regardless of age or body mass index.

Authors:  Lesley A Stead; Timothy L Lash; Jerome E Sobieraj; Dorcas D Chi; Jennifer L Westrup; Marjory Charlot; Rita A Blanchard; John C Lee; Thomas C King; Carol L Rosenberg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Parallel routes of human carcinoma development: implications of the age-specific incidence data.

Authors:  James P Brody
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.