Literature DB >> 12942500

Customizing fetal biometric charts.

M W Pang1, T N Leung, D S Sahota, T K Lau, A M Z Chang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of maternal and pregnancy characteristics on fetal biometric size using longitudinal ultrasound measurements and to construct customized models for fetal biometric size charts.
METHODS: A cohort of 533 healthy pregnant women with normal singleton pregnancies were recruited for regular ultrasound examination for fetal biometry between 24 and 40 weeks' gestation. Multilevel modeling was used to construct models of fetal head size, femur length and abdominal circumference. Variables of maternal and pregnancy characteristics including booking weight and height, age, parity and fetal sex were included in the construction of the customized fetal biometric size charts.
RESULTS: Increased fetal head size and abdominal circumference were significantly associated with extremes of maternal age. Maternal height had a statistically significant influence on biparietal diameter. Maternal booking weight had an influence on fetal abdominal circumference and femur length. Fetal sex was found to have a statistically significant influence on the final regression models of biparietal diameter, head circumference and femur length. Parity had an influence on fetal head circumference and abdominal circumference.
CONCLUSIONS: Maternal and pregnancy characteristics have a significant influence on in-utero fetal biometry. We produced models to construct customized fetal biometric size charts. Further validation studies are necessary to evaluate the clinical usefulness of such customized fetal biometric size charts. Copyright 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12942500     DOI: 10.1002/uog.196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  12 in total

1.  Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.

Authors:  D Kabiri; R Romero; D W Gudicha; E Hernandez-Andrade; P Pacora; N Benshalom-Tirosh; D Tirosh; L Yeo; O Erez; S S Hassan; A L Tarca
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Biparietal diameter measurements using the outer-to-outer versus outer-to-inner measurement: A question of pedantry?

Authors:  Lufee Wong; Eldho Paul; Hamsaveni Km Murday; Jing Fang; Ilona Lavender; Peter R Coombs; Mark Teoh
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-04-16

3.  Reference values of fetal ultrasound biometry: results of a prospective cohort study in Lithuania.

Authors:  Bronius Žaliūnas; Vaidilė Jakaitė; Juozas Kurmanavičius; Daiva Bartkevičienė; Kristina Norvilaitė; Karolina Passerini
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Individually customised fetal weight charts derived from ultrasound measurements: the Generation R Study.

Authors:  Romy Gaillard; Maria A J de Ridder; Bero O Verburg; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Johan P Mackenbach; Henriëtte A Moll; Albert Hofman; Eric A P Steegers; Vincent W V Jaddoe
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 5.  Investigation of normal organ development with fetal MRI.

Authors:  Daniela Prayer; Peter C Brugger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 7.034

6.  Stillbirth and the small fetus: use of a sex-specific versus a non-sex-specific growth standard.

Authors:  A S Trudell; A G Cahill; M G Tuuli; G A Macones; A O Odibo
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Unconditional and conditional standards for fetal abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight in an ethnic Chinese population: a birth cohort study.

Authors:  Ying Xu; Ngee Lek; Yin Bun Cheung; Arijit Biswas; Lin Lin Su; Kenneth Y C Kwek; George S H Yeo; Shu-E Soh; Seang-Mei Saw; Peter D Gluckman; Yap-Seng Chong
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Scientific basis for standardization of fetal head measurements by ultrasound: a reproducibility study.

Authors:  R Napolitano; V Donadono; E O Ohuma; C L Knight; S Z Wanyonyi; B Kemp; T Norris; A T Papageorghiou
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.299

9.  An outcome-based approach for the creation of fetal growth standards: do singletons and twins need separate standards?

Authors:  K S Joseph; John Fahey; Robert W Platt; Robert M Liston; Shoo K Lee; Reg Sauve; Shiliang Liu; Alexander C Allen; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Is It Time to Change Our Reference Curve for Femur Length? Using the Z-Score to Select the Best Chart in a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Boya Li; Huixia Yang; Yumei Wei; Rina Su; Chen Wang; Wenying Meng; Yongqing Wang; Lixin Shang; Zhenyu Cai; Liping Ji; Yunfeng Wang; Ying Sun; Jiaxiu Liu; Li Wei; Yufeng Sun; Xueying Zhang; Tianxia Luo; Haixia Chen; Lijun Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.