Literature DB >> 12941448

Selective deficits of grip force control during object manipulation in patients with reduced sensibility of the grasping digits.

Dennis A Nowak1, Joachim Hermsdörfer.   

Abstract

Persons with impaired manual sensibility frequently report problems to use the hand in manipulative tasks, such as using tools or buttoning a shirt. At least two control processes determine grip forces during voluntary object manipulation. Anticipatory force control specifies the motor commands on the basis of predictions about physical object properties and the consequences of our own actions. Feedback sensory information from the grasping digits, representing mechanical events at the skin-object interface, automatically modifies grip force according to the actual loading requirements and updates sensorimotor memories to support anticipatory grip force control. We investigated grip force control in nine patients with moderately impaired tactile sensibility of the grasping digits and in nine sex- and age-matched healthy controls lifting and holding an instrumented object. In healthy controls grip force was adequately scaled to the weight of the object to be lifted. The grip force was programmed to smoothly change in parallel with load force over the entire lifting movement. In particular, the grip force level was regulated in an economical way to be always slightly higher than the minimum required to prevent the object slipping. The temporal coupling between the grip and load force profiles achieved a high precision with the maximum grip and load forces coinciding closely in time. For the temporal regulation of the grip force profile patients with impaired tactile sensibility maintained the close co-ordination between proximal arm muscles, responsible for the lifting movement and the fingers stabilising the grasp. Maximum grip force coincided with maximum acceleration of the lifting movement. However, patients employed greater maximum grip forces and greater grip forces to hold the object unsupported when compared with controls. Our results give further evidence to the suggestion that during manipulation of objects with known physical properties the anticipatory temporal regulation of the grip force profile is centrally processed and less under sensory feedback control. In contrast, sensory afferent information from the grasping fingers plays a dominant role for the efficient scaling of the grip force level according to actual loading requirements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12941448     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-0102(03)00182-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Res        ISSN: 0168-0102            Impact factor:   3.304


  19 in total

1.  Predictability influences finger force control when catching a free-falling object.

Authors:  Dennis A Nowak; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  [Analysis of grip force during object manipulation. Method for the objective measurement of physiological normal and impaired hand function].

Authors:  Dennis A Nowak; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.214

3.  Asymmetry in grasp force matching and sense of effort.

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Samantha Scotland; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Contemporary linkages between EMG, kinetics and stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Steven L Wolf; Andrew J Butler; Jay L Alberts; Min Wook Kim
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.368

5.  Elaborate force coordination of precision grip could be generalized to bimanual grasping techniques.

Authors:  Paulo Barbosa Freitas; Vennila Krishnan; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Disturbances of grip force behaviour in focal hand dystonia: evidence for a generalised impairment of sensory-motor integration?

Authors:  D A Nowak; K Rosenkranz; H Topka; J Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Manual stimulation of forearm muscles does not improve recovery of motor function after injury to a mixed peripheral nerve.

Authors:  N Sinis; O Guntinas-Lichius; A Irintchev; E Skouras; S Kuerten; S P Pavlov; H E Schaller; S A Dunlop; D N Angelov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effects of local and core body temperature on grip force modulation during movement-induced load force fluctuations.

Authors:  Stephen S Cheung; Luke F Reynolds; Mark A B Macdonald; Constance L Tweedie; Robin L Urquhart; David A Westwood
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Impact of distal median neuropathy on handwriting performance for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome in office and administrative support occupations.

Authors:  Li-Chieh Kuo; Hsiao-Man Hsu; Po-Ting Wu; Sheng-Che Lin; Hsiu-Yun Hsu; I-Ming Jou
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

10.  Stretching the skin immediately enhances perceived stiffness and gradually enhances the predictive control of grip force.

Authors:  Mor Farajian; Raz Leib; Hanna Kossowsky; Tomer Zaidenberg; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.