Literature DB >> 12940566

In vitro investigation of indirect bonding with a hydrophilic primer.

Arndt Klocke1, Jianmin Shi, Bärbel Kahl-Nieke, Ulrich Bismayer.   

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro investigation was to evaluate bond strength for a custom base indirect bonding technique using a hydrophilic primer on moisture-contaminated tooth surfaces. Stainless steel brackets were bonded to 100 permanent bovine incisors using a light-cured custom base composite adhesive, a chemically cured sealant, and the hydrophilic primer Transbond MIP (3M-Unitek, Monrovia, Calif). Five groups (A-E) of 20 teeth each were formed according to the time of contamination (before or after application of the primer) and the type of contaminant (distilled water or saliva): A, control group with no contamination; B, contamination with saliva before application of the primer; C, contamination with water before application of the primer; D, contamination with saliva before and after application of the primer; and E, contamination with water before and after application of the primer. Mean bond strength for the group without contamination (A) was 15.07 +/- 4.14 MPa and was not significantly different from bond strengths for groups B (14.91 +/- 3.99 MPa) and C (16.12 +/- 3.67 MPa), in which contamination occurred before application of the hydrophilic primer. Average bond strength in group D was 11.92 +/- 4.76 MPa. The lowest mean bond strength was measured for group E (9.85 +/- 3.77 MPa) and was significantly lower than for groups A, B, and C. Contamination after primer application resulted in an increased risk of bond failure at clinically relevant levels of stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12940566     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0445:IVIOIB>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  5 in total

1.  Effects of moisture conditions of dental enamel surface on bond strength of brackets bonded with moisture-insensitive primer adhesive system.

Authors:  Toshiya Endo; Rieko Ozoe; Sugako Sanpei; Koichi Shinkai; Yoshiroh Katoh; Shohachi Shimooka
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2008-07-27       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Enamel shear bond strength of two orthodontic self-etching bonding systems compared to Transbond™ XT.

Authors:  Andreas Hellak; Patrick Rusdea; Michael Schauseil; Steffen Stein; Heike Maria Korbmacher-Steiner
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Effect of moisture, saliva, and blood contamination on the shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a conventional bonding system and self-etched bonding system.

Authors:  Mandava Prasad; Shamil Mohamed; Krishna Nayak; Sharath Kumar Shetty; Ashok Kumar Talapaneni
Journal:  J Nat Sci Biol Med       Date:  2014-01

4.  Shear Bond Strength of Three Orthodontic Bonding Systems on Enamel and Restorative Materials.

Authors:  Andreas Hellak; Jennifer Ebeling; Michael Schauseil; Steffen Stein; Matthias Roggendorf; Heike Korbmacher-Steiner
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  In vitro Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Different Adhesives.

Authors:  Junaid Ahmed Shaik; Rajesh Kumar Reddy; K Bhagyalakshmi; Mithun J Shah; O Madhavi; S Venkat Ramesh
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.