Literature DB >> 1294056

The effect of bacterial colonization on venous ulcer healing.

A R Halbert1, M C Stacey, J B Rohr, A Jopp-McKay.   

Abstract

To determine the effect of bacterial colonization on venous ulcer healing, 82 patients with 100 venous ulcerated limbs were each studied prospectively for six months. Despite bacteriological swab results, topical or systemic antibiotics were not administered unless cellulitis supervened. Initial ulcer size, length of ulcer history and time to complete healing of colonized and uncolonized ulcers were determined and compared. Organisms were cultured from 83 limbs prior to commencement of treatment, the commonest isolates being Staphylococcus aureaus (48%), mixed coliforms (28%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (21%) and anaerobes (17%). When compared with ulcers with no bacterial growth, colonized ulcers were of longer duration (p [symbol: see text] 0.01), had a larger initial size (p [symbol: see text] 0.001) and had significantly longer healing time (p [symbol: see text] 0.001). When analysed individually beta-haemolytic streptococci, anaerobes, Staphylococcus aureus and coliforms were associated with delayed healing. Delayed healing was not found with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, although pseudomonas-colonized ulcers were significantly larger and of longer duration than uncolonized ulcers. Bacterial colonization is associated with delayed venous ulcer healing. To further clarify the pathogenicity of colonizing bacteria, however, the effect of their eradiction on healing of venous ulcers needs to be established.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1294056     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.1992.tb00083.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas J Dermatol        ISSN: 0004-8380            Impact factor:   2.875


  28 in total

Review 1.  Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management.

Authors:  P G Bowler; B I Duerden; D G Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  [pH values in chronic wounds. Evaluation during modern wound therapy].

Authors:  J Dissemond; M Witthoff; T C Brauns; D Haberer; M Goos
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 3.  [Conditioning of chronic wounds with proteolytic enzymes].

Authors:  J Dissemond; M Goos
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 4.  Best practice in primary care pathology: review 9.

Authors:  W S A Smellie; N Shaw; R Bowlees; A Taylor; R Howell-Jones; C A M McNulty
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  The clinical efficacy of two semi-quantitative wound-swabbing techniques in identifying the causative organism(s) in infected cutaneous wounds.

Authors:  Donna E Angel; Peter Lloyd; Keryln Carville; Nick Santamaria
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Bacterial isolates from infected wounds and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern: some remarks about wound infection.

Authors:  Lucinda J Bessa; Paolo Fazii; Mara Di Giulio; Luigina Cellini
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  Association Between Microbial Bioburden and Healing Outcomes in Venous Leg Ulcers: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Marie S Tuttle
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 8.  Wound samples: moving towards a standardised method of collection and analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Ramsay; Linda Cowan; Jeffrey M Davidson; Lillian Nanney; Gregory Schultz
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Use of 16S ribosomal DNA PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis for analysis of the microfloras of healing and nonhealing chronic venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Charlotte E Davies; Katja E Hill; Melanie J Wilson; Phil Stephens; C Michael Hill; Keith G Harding; David W Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Bacterial Silver Resistance Gained by Cooperative Interspecies Redox Behavior.

Authors:  Michael Muller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.