Literature DB >> 12939785

A relative survival regression model using B-spline functions to model non-proportional hazards.

Roch Giorgi1, Michal Abrahamowicz, Catherine Quantin, Philippe Bolard, Jacques Esteve, Joanny Gouvernet, Jean Faivre.   

Abstract

Relative survival, a method for assessing prognostic factors for disease-specific mortality in unselected populations, is frequently used in population-based studies. However, most relative survival models assume that the effects of covariates on disease-specific mortality conform with the proportional hazards hypothesis, which may not hold in some long-term studies. To accommodate variation over time of a predictor's effect on disease-specific mortality, we developed a new relative survival regression model using B-splines to model the hazard ratio as a flexible function of time, without having to specify a particular functional form. Our method also allows for testing the hypotheses of hazards proportionality and no association on disease-specific hazard. Accuracy of estimation and inference were evaluated in simulations. The method is illustrated by an analysis of a population-based study of colon cancer. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12939785     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  17 in total

1.  A Case Study Examining the Usefulness of Cure Modelling for the Prediction of Survival Based on Data Maturity.

Authors:  Tim S Grant; Darren Burns; Christopher Kiff; Dawn Lee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  On comparison of net survival curves.

Authors:  Klemen Pavlič; Maja Pohar Perme
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  A class of transformation covariate regression models for estimating the excess hazard in relative survival analysis.

Authors:  Binbing Yu
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Regression splines in the time-dependent coefficient rates model for recurrent event data.

Authors:  Leila D Amorim; Jianwen Cai; Donglin Zeng; Maurício L Barreto
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Dynamic regression hazards models for relative survival.

Authors:  Giuliana Cortese; Thomas H Scheike
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Hazard regression model and cure rate model in colon cancer relative survival trends: are they telling the same story?

Authors:  Theodora Bejan-Angoulvant; Anne-Marie Bouvier; Nadine Bossard; Aurelien Belot; Valérie Jooste; Guy Launoy; Laurent Remontet
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Performance of two formal tests based on martingales residuals to check the proportional hazard assumption and the functional form of the prognostic factors in flexible parametric excess hazard models.

Authors:  Coraline Danieli; Nadine Bossard; Laurent Roche; Aurelien Belot; Zoe Uhry; Hadrien Charvat; Laurent Remontet
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

8.  Competing risk models to estimate the excess mortality and the first recurrent-event hazards.

Authors:  Aurélien Belot; Laurent Remontet; Guy Launoy; Valérie Jooste; Roch Giorgi
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 9.  Modeling survival in colon cancer: a methodological review.

Authors:  Farid E Ahmed; Paul W Vos; Don Holbert
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 27.401

10.  Estimation of age- and stage-specific Catalan breast cancer survival functions using US and Catalan survival data.

Authors:  Ester Vilaprinyo; Montserrat Rué; Rafael Marcos-Gragera; Montserrat Martínez-Alonso
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.