Literature DB >> 12939564

Comparative effect of lercanidipine, felodipine, and nifedipine GITS on blood pressure and heart rate in patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension: the Lercanidipine in Adults (LEAD) Study.

Roberta Romito1, Maria Ida Pansini, Francesco Perticone, Gianfranco Antonelli, Mariavittoria Pitzalis, Paolo Rizzon.   

Abstract

This multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the effects of three dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (lercanidipine, felodipine, and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system) on blood pressure and heart rate in 250 patients with mild to moderate hypertension (diastolic blood pressure > or =95 and 109 mm Hg). Patients were randomized to 4 weeks of treatment with once-daily doses of lercanidipine 10 mg, felodipine 10 mg, or nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system 30 mg. After 4 weeks of treatment, the dose was doubled in nonresponding patients. At 8 weeks, no significant differences in blood pressure were observed among the three groups. Increases in heart rate in all three groups induced by stressful conditions before and after treatment were not exacerbated during active treatment. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was lower in the lercanidipine and nifedipine groups than in the felodipine group (p<0.05); in particular, the incidence of edema for lercanidipine was 5.5% vs. 13% for felodipine and 6.6% for nifedipine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12939564      PMCID: PMC8101891          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.01960.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  7 in total

Review 1.  Calcium entry blockers in the treatment of hypertension. Current status and future prospects.

Authors:  N M Kaplan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Lercanidipine: a novel lipophilic dihydropyridine calcium antagonist with long duration of action and high vascular selectivity.

Authors:  P A Meredith
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.206

3.  Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators.

Authors:  J A Staessen; R Fagard; L Thijs; H Celis; G G Arabidze; W H Birkenhäger; C J Bulpitt; P W de Leeuw; C T Dollery; A E Fletcher; F Forette; G Leonetti; C Nachev; E T O'Brien; J Rosenfeld; J L Rodicio; J Tuomilehto; A Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-09-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, calcium blockers, and diuretics for the control of systolic hypertension.

Authors:  T O Morgan; A I Anderson; R J MacInnis
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 5.  Calcium antagonists in hypertension: from hemodynamics to outcomes.

Authors:  Franz H Messerli
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.689

6.  Tolerability of long-term treatment with lercanidipine versus amlodipine and lacidipine in elderly hypertensives.

Authors:  Gastone Leonetti; Bruno Magnani; Achille Cesare Pessina; Alessandro Rappelli; Bruno Trimarco; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 7.  Lercanidipine: a review of its use in hypertension.

Authors:  K J McClellan; B Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.431

  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Updated meta-analytical approach to the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in reducing blood pressure.

Authors:  J P Baguet; B Legallicier; P Auquier; S Robitail
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Lercanidipine : a review of its efficacy in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Lynne M Bang; Therese M Chapman; Karen L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Thrapeutic equivalence in the treatment of hypertension: Can lercanidipine and nifedipine GITS be considered to be interchangeable?

Authors:  Henry L Elliott; Peter A Meredith
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-26

Review 4.  Lercanidipine in hypertension.

Authors:  Claudio Borghi
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2005

5.  A Retrospective, Observational, EMR-Based Real-World Evidence Study to Assess the Incidence of Pedal Edema in Essential Hypertensive Patients on Amlodipine or Cilnidipine.

Authors:  Jamshed Dalal; J P Sawhney; P B Jayagopal; P K Hazra; Mohammed Yunus Khan; Kumar Gaurav; Colette Pinto; Amey Mane; Sachin Rao; Madhur Jain
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.420

6.  Fixed combination of lercanidipine and enalapril in the management of hypertension: focus on patient preference and adherence.

Authors:  Claudio Borghi; Francesca Santi
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 7.  Fixed combinations in the management of hypertension: perspectives on lercanidipine-enalapril.

Authors:  Vivencio Barrios; Carlos Escobar; Rocio Echarri
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008

8.  Lercanidipine is an effective and well tolerated antihypertensive drug regardless the cardiovascular risk profile: The LAURA study.

Authors:  V Barrios; C Escobar; A Navarro; L Barrios; J Navarro-Cid; A Calderón
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  Lercanidipine in the Management of Hypertension: An Update.

Authors:  Guido Grassi; Nicolàs R Robles; Gino Seravalle; Francesco Fici
Journal:  J Pharmacol Pharmacother       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.