Literature DB >> 12939229

Characterization of dysfunctional myocardium by positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance: relation to functional outcome after revascularization.

Patrick R Knuesel1, Daniel Nanz, Christophe Wyss, Martin Buechi, Philip A Kaufmann, Gustav K von Schulthess, Thomas F Lüscher, Juerg Schwitter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metabolic assessment of dysfunctional myocardium by PET allows prediction of functional recovery after revascularization. Contrast-enhanced MR (ce-MR) discriminates transmural distribution of viable and scar tissue with excellent spatial resolution. Both techniques were applied in ischemic chronic left ventricular dysfunction to relate metabolism and tissue composition to changes of contractile function after revascularization. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Nineteen patients with myocardial infarctions (>3 months) were studied by MR and PET, and 10 patients were followed by MR 11+/-2 months after revascularization. In 56 to 64 segments/heart, systolic wall thickening, viable mass, and thickness of viable rim tissue were determined by MR (inversion-recovery MR with 0.25 mmol/kg Gd-chelate). [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake and resting perfusion (13N-ammonia) were determined by PET. Viable tissue per segment on ce-MR correlated with FDG uptake per segment (r=0.62 and 0.82 for segments with and without flow metabolism mismatch, P<0.0001). FDG uptake > or =50% (a predictor of functional recovery) corresponded to a viable rim thickness of 4.5 mm on ce-MR. Thick (>4.5 mm) and metabolically viable segments (> or =50% FDG uptake) showed functional recovery in 85%, whereas thin metabolically nonviable segments improved function in 13% (P<0.0005). Metabolically viable segments with a thin viable rim and thick segments with reduced FDG uptake improved function in only 36% and 23% of segments, respectively (NS versus thin metabolically nonviable). In these 2 classes of segments, scar per segment was higher than in thick viable segments (P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Metabolism and tissue composition discriminate various classes of dysfunctional myocardium. Most metabolically viable segments with a thick viable rim on ce-MR recover function after revascularization, whereas all other classes showed low recovery rates of contractile function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12939229     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000085993.93936.BA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  41 in total

Review 1.  Use of cardiac magnetic resonance to assess viability.

Authors:  Anja Wagner; Heiko Mahrholdt; Raymond J Kim; Robert M Judd
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: structure, function, perfusion, and viability.

Authors:  David C Isbell; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Myocardial perfusion imaging by cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure.

Authors:  Frank M Bengel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 5.  Characterization of myocardial viability using MR and CT imaging.

Authors:  Gabriele A Krombach; Thoralf Niendorf; Rolf W Günther; Andreas H Mahnken
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  SPECT and PET in ischemic heart failure.

Authors:  George Angelidis; Gregory Giamouzis; Georgios Karagiannis; Javed Butler; Ioannis Tsougos; Varvara Valotassiou; George Giannakoulas; Nikolaos Dimakopoulos; Andrew Xanthopoulos; John Skoularigis; Filippos Triposkiadis; Panagiotis Georgoulias
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.214

7.  Washout of ⁸²Rb as a marker of impaired tissue integrity, obtained by list-mode cardiac PET/CT: relationship with perfusion/metabolism patterns of myocardial viability.

Authors:  David T Chien; Paco Bravo; Takahiro Higuchi; Jennifer Merrill; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Viability assessment with MRI is superior to FDG-PET for viability: Con.

Authors:  Randolph E Patterson; Steven R Sigman; Robert E O'Donnell; Robert L Eisner
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Prediction of functional recovery after revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction by gated FDG-PET.

Authors:  Riemer H J A Slart; Jeroen J Bax; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Ernst E van der Wall; Rudi A Dierckx; Jaep de Boer; Pieter L Jager
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Agreement and disagreement between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear imaging for assessment of myocardial viability.

Authors:  Stijntje D Roes; Theodorus A M Kaandorp; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Jos J M Westenberg; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Marcel P Stokkel; Hildo J Lamb; Ernst E van der Wall; Albert de Roos; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.