PURPOSE: To evaluate MR signal and lesion zone volume evolution through the sub-acute phase following image-guided radiofrequency (RF) thermal ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For many tissues, including muscle and liver, thermal lesions that result from RF heating have a characteristic two-boundary appearance featuring an inner core (zone I) surrounded by a hyper-intense margin (zone II) and normal tissue (zone III), found in both T(2) and contrast enhanced (CE) T(1)-weighted MR images, both immediately post-ablation and four days later. First, we compared corresponding points between manually segmented zone boundaries apparent in T(2)- and CE T(1)-weighted images. Second, we examined the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between all zone combinations. Third, we quantified the volume of zone I, zone II, and the entire lesion using a three-dimensional lesion geometry model fitted to segmented images. RESULTS: On a slice-by-slice basis, no statistically significant differences were found between zone boundaries apparent in T(2) and CE T(1)-weighted images. The contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of zone I vs. zone II, zone I vs. background muscle, and zone II vs. background muscle was always equal or greater for T(2)-weighted images than for CE T(1)-weighted images. In addition, by day four, zone II significantly increased in intensity compared to background muscle. The median Zone I volume increase was 44.2% (42.6%) using T(2) weighted images and 55.5% (68.7% interquartile range) using CE T(1)- weighted images. This expansion likely corresponds to an enlargement of the ablated, coagulative necrosis, region. The median Zone II volume increase was 15.0% (42.6%) using T(2)- weighted images 1.5% (38.8%) using CE T(1)-weighted images. CONCLUSIONS: 1) There are no significant differences between the apparent zone boundaries in T(2)- and CE T(1)-weighted images; 2) CNR is equal or greater for T(2)-weighted images as compared to CE T(1)-images; and 3) both the inner and outer lesion zone volumes typically increase several days post-ablation. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To evaluate MR signal and lesion zone volume evolution through the sub-acute phase following image-guided radiofrequency (RF) thermal ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For many tissues, including muscle and liver, thermal lesions that result from RF heating have a characteristic two-boundary appearance featuring an inner core (zone I) surrounded by a hyper-intense margin (zone II) and normal tissue (zone III), found in both T(2) and contrast enhanced (CE) T(1)-weighted MR images, both immediately post-ablation and four days later. First, we compared corresponding points between manually segmented zone boundaries apparent in T(2)- and CE T(1)-weighted images. Second, we examined the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between all zone combinations. Third, we quantified the volume of zone I, zone II, and the entire lesion using a three-dimensional lesion geometry model fitted to segmented images. RESULTS: On a slice-by-slice basis, no statistically significant differences were found between zone boundaries apparent in T(2) and CE T(1)-weighted images. The contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of zone I vs. zone II, zone I vs. background muscle, and zone II vs. background muscle was always equal or greater for T(2)-weighted images than for CE T(1)-weighted images. In addition, by day four, zone II significantly increased in intensity compared to background muscle. The median Zone I volume increase was 44.2% (42.6%) using T(2) weighted images and 55.5% (68.7% interquartile range) using CE T(1)- weighted images. This expansion likely corresponds to an enlargement of the ablated, coagulative necrosis, region. The median Zone II volume increase was 15.0% (42.6%) using T(2)- weighted images 1.5% (38.8%) using CE T(1)-weighted images. CONCLUSIONS: 1) There are no significant differences between the apparent zone boundaries in T(2)- and CE T(1)-weighted images; 2) CNR is equal or greater for T(2)-weighted images as compared to CE T(1)-images; and 3) both the inner and outer lesion zone volumes typically increase several days post-ablation. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Joshua P Yung; Anil Shetty; Andrew Elliott; Jeffrey S Weinberg; Roger J McNichols; Ashok Gowda; John D Hazle; R Jason Stafford Journal: Med Phys Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Andreas Boss; Petros Martirosian; Christina Schraml; Stephan Clasen; Michael Fenchel; Artistotelis Anastasiadis; Claus D Claussen; Philippe L Pereira; Fritz Schick Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2006-01-27 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Xiaoyang Liu; Nicholas Ellens; Emery Williams; Everette C Burdette; Parag Karmarkar; Clifford R Weiss; Dara Kraitchman; Paul A Bottomley Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-08-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Eran Leshem; Cory M Tschabrunn; Fernando M Contreras-Valdes; Israel Zilberman; Elad Anter Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Frederik Vandenbroucke; Jef Vandemeulebroucke; Nico Buls; Ruedi F Thoeni; Johan de Mey Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2018-04-12 Impact factor: 2.924