Literature DB >> 12938089

Translocation and gross deletion breakpoints in human inherited disease and cancer II: Potential involvement of repetitive sequence elements in secondary structure formation between DNA ends.

Nadia Chuzhanova1, Shaun S Abeysinghe, Michael Krawczak, David N Cooper.   

Abstract

Translocations and gross deletions are responsible for a significant proportion of both cancer and inherited disease. Although such gene rearrangements are nonuniformly distributed in the human genome, the underlying mutational mechanisms remain unclear. We have studied the potential involvement of various types of repetitive sequence elements in the formation of secondary structure intermediates between the single-stranded DNA ends that recombine during rearrangements. Complexity analysis was used to assess the potential of these ends to form secondary structures, the maximum decrease in complexity consequent to a gross rearrangement being used as an indicator of the type of repeat and the specific DNA ends involved. A total of 175 pairs of deletion/translocation breakpoint junction sequences available from the Gross Rearrangement Breakpoint Database [GRaBD; www.uwcm.ac.uk/uwcm/mg/grabd/grabd.html] were analyzed. Potential secondary structure was noted between the 5' flanking sequence of the first breakpoint and the 3' flanking sequence of the second breakpoint in 49% of rearrangements and between the 5' flanking sequence of the second breakpoint and the 3' flanking sequence of the first breakpoint in 36% of rearrangements. Inverted repeats, inversions of inverted repeats, and symmetric elements were found in association with gross rearrangements at approximately the same frequency. However, inverted repeats and inversions of inverted repeats accounted for the vast majority (83%) of deletions plus small insertions, symmetric elements for one-half of all antigen receptor-mediated translocations, while direct repeats appear only to be involved in mediating simple deletions. These findings extend our understanding of illegitimate recombination by highlighting the importance of secondary structure formation between single-stranded DNA ends at breakpoint junctions. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12938089     DOI: 10.1002/humu.10253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mutat        ISSN: 1059-7794            Impact factor:   4.878


  34 in total

1.  Diverse patterns of the tandem repeats organization in rye chromosomes.

Authors:  Olena G Alkhimova; Nina A Mazurok; Tatyana A Potapova; Suren M Zakian; John S Heslop-Harrison; Alexander V Vershinin
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  AREM: aligning short reads from ChIP-sequencing by expectation maximization.

Authors:  Daniel Newkirk; Jacob Biesinger; Alvin Chon; Kyoko Yokomori; Xiaohui Xie
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 1.479

3.  Identification of sequence motifs at the breakpoint junctions in three t(1;9)(p36.3;q34) and delineation of mechanisms involved in generating balanced translocations.

Authors:  Marzena Gajecka; Adam Pavlicek; Caron D Glotzbach; Blake C Ballif; Malgorzata Jarmuz; Jerzy Jurka; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Genomic deletion of a long-range bone enhancer misregulates sclerostin in Van Buchem disease.

Authors:  Gabriela G Loots; Michaela Kneissel; Hansjoerg Keller; Myma Baptist; Jessie Chang; Nicole M Collette; Dmitriy Ovcharenko; Ingrid Plajzer-Frick; Edward M Rubin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  The random versus fragile breakage models of chromosome evolution: a matter of resolution.

Authors:  Thomas S Becker; Boris Lenhard
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 3.291

6.  The excess of small inverted repeats in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Emmanuel D Ladoukakis; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Genetic basis of variation in adenoma multiplicity in ApcMin/+ Mom1S mice.

Authors:  Jackie Haines; Victoria Johnson; Kevin Pack; Nirosha Suraweera; Predrag Slijepcevic; Erik Cabuy; Margaret Coster; Mohammad Ilyas; Jennifer Wilding; Oliver Sieber; Walter Bodmer; Ian Tomlinson; Andrew Silver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Unexpected complexity at breakpoint junctions in phenotypically normal individuals and mechanisms involved in generating balanced translocations t(1;22)(p36;q13).

Authors:  Marzena Gajecka; Andrew J Gentles; Albert Tsai; David Chitayat; Katherine L Mackay; Caron D Glotzbach; Michael R Lieber; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Type 2 NF1 deletions are highly unusual by virtue of the absence of nonallelic homologous recombination hotspots and an apparent preference for female mitotic recombination.

Authors:  Katharina Steinmann; David N Cooper; Lan Kluwe; Nadia A Chuzhanova; Cornelia Senger; Eduard Serra; Conxi Lazaro; Montserrat Gilaberte; Katharina Wimmer; Viktor-Felix Mautner; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Sequencing and analyzing the t(1;7) reciprocal translocation breakpoints associated with a case of childhood-onset schizophrenia/autistic disorder.

Authors:  Jacquelyn R Idol; Anjene M Addington; Robert T Long; Judith L Rapoport; Eric D Green
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2007-09-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.