Literature DB >> 12937551

A Model for Learning Over Time: The Big Picture.

Herbert K Amato1, Jeff G Konin, Holly Brader.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present a method of describing the concept of "learning over time" with respect to its implementation into an athletic training education program curriculum.
BACKGROUND: The formal process of learning over time has recently been introduced as a required way for athletic training educational competencies and clinical proficiencies to be delivered and mastered. Learning over time incorporates the documented cognitive, psychomotor, and affective skills associated with the acquisition, progression, and reflection of information. This method of academic preparation represents a move away from a quantitative-based learning module toward a proficiency-based mastery of learning. Little research or documentation can be found demonstrating either the specificity of this concept or suggestions for its application. DESCRIPTION: We present a model for learning over time that encompasses multiple indicators for assessment in a successive format. Based on a continuum approach, cognitive, psychomotor, and affective characteristics are assessed at different levels in classroom and clinical environments. Clinical proficiencies are a common set of entry-level skills that need to be integrated into the athletic training educational domains. Objective documentation is presented, including the skill breakdown of a task and a matrix to identify a timeline of competency and proficiency delivery. CLINICAL ADVANTAGES: The advantages of learning over time pertain to the integration of cognitive knowledge into clinical skill acquisition. Given the fact that learning over time has been implemented as a required concept for athletic training education programs, this model may serve to assist those program faculty who have not yet developed, or are in the process of developing, a method of administering this approach to learning.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 12937551      PMCID: PMC164431     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  3 in total

1.  Clinical Experiences Are Not Predictive of Outcomes on the NATABOC Examination.

Authors:  P S Turocy; R E Comfort; D H Perrin; J H Gieck
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  The clinical portfolio as an assessment tool.

Authors:  M K Lettus; P H Moessner; L Dooley
Journal:  Nurs Adm Q       Date:  2001

3.  An Investigation of Undergraduate Athletic Training Students' Learning Styles and Program Admission Success.

Authors:  Kelly A. Brower; Catherine L. Stemmans; Christopher D. Ingersoll; David J. Langley
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.860

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  Effects of Clinical Field-Experience Setting on Athletic Training Students' Perceived Percentage of Time Spent on Active Learning.

Authors:  David C. Berry; Michael G. Miller; Leisha M. Berry
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Learning person-centred consultation skills in clinical medicine: A randomised controlled case study.

Authors:  Jakobus M Louw; Johannes F M Hugo
Journal:  S Afr Fam Pract (2004)       Date:  2020-07-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.