Literature DB >> 12935827

Use of pulse oximetry to predict in-hospital complications in normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism.

Jeffrey A Kline1, Jackeline Hernandez-Nino, Craig D Newgard, Dana N Cowles, Raymond E Jackson, D Mark Courtney.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A simple method is needed to risk stratify normotensive patients with pulmonary embolism. We studied whether bedside clinical data can predict in-hospital complications from pulmonary embolism.
METHODS: We performed a multicenter derivation phase, followed by validation in a single center. All patients were normotensive; the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was established by objective imaging. Classification and regression analysis was performed to derive a decision tree from 27 parameters recorded from 207 patients. The validation study was conducted on a separate group of 96 patients to determine the derived criterion's diagnostic accuracy for in-hospital complications (cardiogenic shock, respiratory failure, or death).
RESULTS: Mortality in the derivation phase was 4% (n = 8) at 24 hours and 10% (n = 21) at 30 days. A room-air pulse oximetry reading <95% was the most important predictor of death; mortality was 2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0% to 6%) in patients with pulse oximetry >or=95% versus 20% (95% CI: 12% to 29%) with pulse oximetry <95%. In the validation phase, the room-air pulse oximetry was <95% at the time of diagnosis in 9 of 10 patients who developed an in-hospital complication (sensitivity, 90%) and >or=95% in 55 of 86 patients without complications (specificity, 64%).
CONCLUSION: Mortality from pulmonary embolism in normotensive patients is high. A room-air pulse oximetry reading >or=95% at diagnosis is associated with a significantly lower probability of in-hospital complications from pulmonary embolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12935827     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(03)00328-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  8 in total

1.  Pulse oximetry.

Authors:  Amal Jubran
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-07-24       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Current treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Nigel S Key; Raj S Kasthuri
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 8.311

3.  Pulmonary embolism risk stratification: pulse oximetry and pulmonary embolism severity index.

Authors:  Kristen Nordenholz; Jordan Ryan; Benjamin Atwood; Kennon Heard
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  Innovation and translation efforts in wireless medical connectivity, telemedicine and eMedicine: a story from the RFID Center of Excellence at the University of Pittsburgh.

Authors:  Ervin Sejdić; Michael A Rothfuss; Joshua R Stachel; Nicholas G Franconi; Kara Bocan; Michael R Lovell; Marlin H Mickle
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Pretest probability assessment derived from attribute matching.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kline; Charles L Johnson; Charles V Pollack; Deborah B Diercks; Judd E Hollander; Craig D Newgard; J Lee Garvey
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Smartphone camera oximetry in an induced hypoxemia study.

Authors:  Jason S Hoffman; Varun K Viswanath; Caiwei Tian; Xinyi Ding; Matthew J Thompson; Eric C Larson; Shwetak N Patel; Edward J Wang
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-09-19

7.  Pulse oximetry in bronchiolitis: is it needed?

Authors:  Mohamed A Hendaus; Fatima A Jomha; Ahmed H Alhammadi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Risk factors for postpartum sepsis: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Samina Bakhtawar; Sana Sheikh; Rahat Qureshi; Zahra Hoodbhoy; Beth Payne; Iqbal Azam; Peter von Dadelszen; Laura Magee
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.