Literature DB >> 12935343

Significance of interspecies matches when evolutionary rate varies.

Jia Li1, Webb Miller.   

Abstract

We develop techniques to estimate the statistical significance of gap-free alignments between two genomic DNA sequences, using human-mouse alignments as an example. The sequences are assumed to be sufficiently similar that some but not all of the neutrally evolving regions (i.e., those under no evolutionary constraint) can be reliably aligned. Our goal is to model the situation in which the neutral rate of evolution, and hence the extent of the aligning intervals, varies across the genome. In some cases, this permits the weaker of two matches to be judged as less likely to have arisen by chance, provided it lies in a genomic interval with a high level of background divergence. We employ a hidden Markov model to capture variations in divergence rates and assign probability values to gap-free alignments using techniques of Dembo and Karlin, which are related to those used for the same purpose by BLAST. Our methods are illustrated in detail using a 1.49 Mb genomic region. Results obtained from the analysis of human chromosome 22 using these techniques are also provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12935343     DOI: 10.1089/10665270360688174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  7 in total

Review 1.  Cross-species sequence comparisons: a review of methods and available resources.

Authors:  Kelly A Frazer; Laura Elnitski; Deanna M Church; Inna Dubchak; Ross C Hardison
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Finding cis-regulatory elements using comparative genomics: some lessons from ENCODE data.

Authors:  David C King; James Taylor; Ying Zhang; Yong Cheng; Heather A Lawson; Joel Martin; Francesca Chiaromonte; Webb Miller; Ross C Hardison
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Germline DNA replication timing shapes mammalian genome composition.

Authors:  Yishai Yehuda; Britny Blumenfeld; Nina Mayorek; Kirill Makedonski; Oriya Vardi; Leonor Cohen-Daniel; Yousef Mansour; Shulamit Baror-Sebban; Hagit Masika; Marganit Farago; Michael Berger; Shai Carmi; Yosef Buganim; Amnon Koren; Itamar Simon
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  The effects of chromatin organization on variation in mutation rates in the genome.

Authors:  Kateryna D Makova; Ross C Hardison
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  What fraction of the human genome is functional?

Authors:  Chris P Ponting; Ross C Hardison
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Patterns of insertions and their covariation with substitutions in the rat, mouse, and human genomes.

Authors:  Shan Yang; Arian F Smit; Scott Schwartz; Francesca Chiaromonte; Krishna M Roskin; David Haussler; Webb Miller; Ross C Hardison
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Covariation in frequencies of substitution, deletion, transposition, and recombination during eutherian evolution.

Authors:  Ross C Hardison; Krishna M Roskin; Shan Yang; Mark Diekhans; W James Kent; Ryan Weber; Laura Elnitski; Jia Li; Michael O'Connor; Diana Kolbe; Scott Schwartz; Terrence S Furey; Simon Whelan; Nick Goldman; Arian Smit; Webb Miller; Francesca Chiaromonte; David Haussler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.043

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.