BACKGROUND: Major depression is often treated with medications in doses that are too low or too short in duration. We published an early version of the Antidepressant Treatment History Form (ATHF) that rates the adequacy of antidepressant treatment. The updated ATHF presented here includes newer medications and a computer algorithm to automate the evaluation of the adequacy of pharmacotherapy or electroconvulsive therapy for depression. METHOD: The computer algorithm was written in MS-DOS Q-BASIC and in Visual Basic 5.0. Treatment data from 47 depressed (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R) patients were scored by the computer algorithm and assigned a number from 0 to 5 for the adequacy of antidepressant treatment. A psychiatrist blinded to the computer ratings manually rated the treatment using the ATHF. RESULTS: The computer algorithm, based on an updated version of the ATHF, estimates the adequacy of treatment of unipolar and bipolar depression. Computer algorithm results agreed with those generated by a clinician completing the form manually (kappa = 0.88 to 1.00). CONCLUSION: The computer algorithm can be used to analyze large databases and may help reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with major depression by improving the assessment of adequacy of pharmacologic treatments for research and quality assurance purposes. The availability of the updated ATHF on the Internet for downloading allows for modifications according to the user's purposes.
BACKGROUND: Major depression is often treated with medications in doses that are too low or too short in duration. We published an early version of the Antidepressant Treatment History Form (ATHF) that rates the adequacy of antidepressant treatment. The updated ATHF presented here includes newer medications and a computer algorithm to automate the evaluation of the adequacy of pharmacotherapy or electroconvulsive therapy for depression. METHOD: The computer algorithm was written in MS-DOS Q-BASIC and in Visual Basic 5.0. Treatment data from 47 depressed (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R) patients were scored by the computer algorithm and assigned a number from 0 to 5 for the adequacy of antidepressant treatment. A psychiatrist blinded to the computer ratings manually rated the treatment using the ATHF. RESULTS: The computer algorithm, based on an updated version of the ATHF, estimates the adequacy of treatment of unipolar and bipolar depression. Computer algorithm results agreed with those generated by a clinician completing the form manually (kappa = 0.88 to 1.00). CONCLUSION: The computer algorithm can be used to analyze large databases and may help reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with major depression by improving the assessment of adequacy of pharmacologic treatments for research and quality assurance purposes. The availability of the updated ATHF on the Internet for downloading allows for modifications according to the user's purposes.
Authors: Stephen F Smagula; Meredith L Wallace; Stewart J Anderson; Jordan F Karp; Eric J Lenze; Benoit H Mulsant; Meryl A Butters; Daniel M Blumberger; Breno S Diniz; Francis E Lotrich; Mary Amanda Dew; Charles F Reynolds Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Charles A Hall; Kevin M Simon; Eric J Lenze; Mary Amanda Dew; Amy Begley; Meryl A Butters; Daniel M Blumberger; Jacqueline A Stack; Benoit Mulsant; Charles F Reynolds Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: W Curt LaFrance; Andrew S Blum; Ivan W Miller; Christine E Ryan; Gabor I Keitner Journal: J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2007 Impact factor: 2.198
Authors: Lauren Waterman; Sarah T Stahl; Daniel J Buysse; Eric J Lenze; Daniel Blumberger; Benoit Mulsant; Meryl Butters; Marie Anne Gebara; Charles F Reynolds; Jordan F Karp Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Alastair J Flint; Barnett S Meyers; Anthony J Rothschild; Ellen M Whyte; George S Alexopoulos; Matthew V Rudorfer; Patricia Marino; Samprit Banerjee; Cristina D Pollari; Yiyuan Wu; Aristotle N Voineskos; Benoit H Mulsant Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-08-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Carmen Andreescu; Benoit H Mulsant; Patricia R Houck; Ellen M Whyte; Sati Mazumdar; Alexandre Y Dombrovski; Bruce G Pollock; Charles F Reynolds Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Matthew S Milak; Ramin V Parsey; Leilani Lee; Maria A Oquendo; Doreen M Olvet; Francoise Eipper; Kevin Malone; J John Mann Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2009-05-14 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Stephen F Smagula; Meryl A Butters; Stewart J Anderson; Eric J Lenze; Mary Amanda Dew; Benoit H Mulsant; Francis E Lotrich; Howard Aizenstein; Charles F Reynolds Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 21.596