Literature DB >> 12934788

Current practice in pulmonary function testing.

Scott E Evans1, Paul D Scanlon.   

Abstract

More than 30 million Americans have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, with internists, pediatricians, and family physicians providing most of their medical care. Recent management guidelines for asthma and COPD recommend regular use of spirometry for the diagnosis and management of these disorders. Because of the development of easy-to-use office-based spirometers, an increasing number of physicians have ready access to spirometry. Beyond simple spirometry, various tests are available from many pulmonary function laboratories for more detailed evaluation of patients with respiratory disorders. For these reasons, all physicians who care for patients with pulmonary disease must understand basic pulmonary function testing and have a fundamental understanding of more sophisticated tests. A series of performance standards has been developed for improved accuracy and precision of pulmonary function tests. Physicians responsible for administering and interpreting pulmonary function tests, even simple spirometry, must be aware of relevant guidelines. This concise review addresses current indications for pulmonary function testing, provides an overview of the studies commonly available in modern pulmonary function laboratories, and includes comments on basic interpretation and testing standards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12934788     DOI: 10.4065/78.6.758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  2 in total

1.  Chronic pulmonary disease negatively influences the prognosis of patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chang Wook Jeong; Ja Hyeon Ku; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Prevalence and risk factors for reduced pulmonary function in diabetic patients: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Kim; Tae Seo Sohn; Hannah Seok; Chang Dong Yeo; Young Soo Kim; Jae Yen Song; Young Bok Lee; Dong-Hee Lee; Jae-Im Lee; Tae-Kyu Lee; Seong Cheol Jeong; Mihee Hong; Hiun Suk Chae
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.884

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.