Literature DB >> 12934650

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterization of gliclazide in healthy volunteers.

Hosoon Kim1, Minhyuk Yun, Kwang-il Kwon.   

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of gliclazide were studied after an oral administration of gliclazide tablets in healthy volunteers. After an overnight fasting, gliclazide tablet was orally administered to 11 volunteers. Additional 10 volunteers were used as a control group (i.e., no gliclazide administration). Blood samples were collected, and the concentration determined for gliclazide and glucose up to 24 after the administration. Standard pharmacokinetic analysis was carried out for gliclazide. Pharmacodynamic activity of the drug was expressed by increase of glucose concentration (deltaPG), by area under the increase of glucose concentration-time curve (AUC(deltaPG)) or by the difference in increase of glucose concentration (D(deltaPG)) at each time between groups with and without gliclazide administration. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that Cmax, Tmax, CL/F (apparent clearance), V/F (apparent volume of distribution) and half-life of gliclazide were 4.69+/-1.38 mg/L, 3.45+/-1.11 h, 1.26+/-0.35 L/h, 17.78+/-5.27 L, and 9.99+/-2.15 h, respectively. When compared with the no drug administration group, gliclazide decreased significantly the AUC(deltaPG) s at 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3 and 4 h (p<0.05). The deltaPGs were positively correlated with AUC(gliclazide) at 1 and 1.5 h (p<0.05), and the correlation coefficient was maximum at 1 h (r = 0.642) and gradually decreased at 4 h after the administration. The AUC(deltaPG)s were positively correlated with AUC(gliclazide) at 1, 2, 3 and 4 h (p<0.05), and the maximum correlation coefficient was obtained at 2 h (r=0.642) after the administration. The D(deltaPG) reached the maximum at 1 h, remained constant from 1 h to 3 h, and decreased afterwards. Therefore, these observations indicated that maximum hypoglycemic effect of gliclazide was reached at approximately at 1.5 h after the administration and the effect decreased, probably because of the homeostasis mechanism, in health volunteers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12934650     DOI: 10.1007/bf02976882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pharm Res        ISSN: 0253-6269            Impact factor:   4.946


  3 in total

1.  Limited sampling strategy models for estimating the AUC of gliclazide in Chinese healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Ji-Han Huang; Kun Wang; Xiao-Hui Huang; Ying-Chun He; Lu-Jin Li; Yu-Cheng Sheng; Juan Yang; Qing-Shan Zheng
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.441

2.  Unexplained severe hypoglycaemia in hospital: a difficult diagnostic challenge.

Authors:  Jonathan Walker; Rebecca White; Allister Vale; Simon Elliott; John Wass; John Reynolds
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Formulation, Pharmacokinetics evaluation, and IVIVC Assessment of Gliclazide Multiparticulates in Rat Model.

Authors:  Ahmed A El-Ashmawy; Aya R Abdou; Nesrin F Taha; Ebtesam W Elsayed; Khaled M Mahmoud; Laila H Emara
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.246

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.