Literature DB >> 12934206

Acetabular component revision with frozen massive structural pelvic allograft: average 5-year follow-up.

Philippe Piriou1, Franck Sagnet, Mark R Norton, Christian Garreau de Loubresse, Thierry Judet.   

Abstract

We evaluated the use of a hemipelvic acetabular transplant in 20 revision hip arthroplasties with massive acetabular bone defects. We report 65% good intermediate-term results at a mean follow-up of 5 years (4-10 years). A cemented cup (without a reinforcement ring) was entirely supported by the allograft in all procedures. There were 7 failures (5 aseptic loosening and 2 deep infections). Two dislocations occurred but did not require acetabular revision. There were 2 cases in which moderate acetabular migration occurred but then stabilised and did not progress. Thirteen of 20 acetabular reconstructions did not require revision. We believe that these are satisfactory intermediate-term results for massive acetabular defects too large for reconstruction with other standard techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12934206     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00106-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  3 in total

1.  Reconstruction of Paprosky type IIIB acetabular bone defects using a cup-on-cup technique: A surgical technique and case series.

Authors:  Yin-Qiao Du; Yu-Ping Liu; Jing-Yang Sun; Ming Ni; Yong-Gang Zhou
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Mid-term outcomes of hemipelvic allograft reconstruction after pelvic bone tumor resections.

Authors:  Ahmet Fevzi Kekeç; Bedii Şafak Güngör
Journal:  Jt Dis Relat Surg       Date:  2022-03-28

3.  Acetabular revision using a total acetabular allograft.

Authors:  Rajesh Malhotra; Vijay Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.251

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.