| Literature DB >> 12934178 |
Ulrik Bak Dragsted1, Jan Gerstoft, Court Pedersen, Barry Peters, Adriana Duran, Niels Obel, Antonella Castagna, Pedro Cahn, Nathan Clumeck, Johan N Bruun, Jorge Benetucci, Andrew Hill, Isabel Cassetti, Pietro Vernazza, Mike Youle, Zoe Fox, Jens D Lundgren.
Abstract
This trial assessed the rate of virological failure at 48 weeks in adult human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1-infected patients assigned indinavir/ritonavir (Idv/Rtv; 800/100 mg 2 times daily) or saquinavir/ritonavir (Sqv/Rtv; 1000/100 mg 2 times daily) in an open-label, randomized (1:1), multicenter, phase 4 design. Three hundred six patients began the assigned treatment. At 48 weeks, virological failure was seen in 43 (27%) of 158 and 37 (25%) of 148 patients in the Idv/Rtv and Sqv/Rtv arms, respectively. The time to virological failure did not differ between study arms (P=.76). When switching from randomized treatment was counted as failure, this was seen in 78 of 158 patients in the Idv/Rtv arm, versus 51 of 148 patients in the Sqv/Rtv arm (P=.009). A switch from the randomized treatment occurred in 64 (41%) of 158 patients in the Idv/Rtv arm, versus 40 (27%) of 148 patients in the Sqv/Rtv arm (P=.013). Sixty-four percent of the switches occurred because of adverse events. A greater number of treatment-limiting adverse events were observed in the Idv/Rtv arm, relative to the Sqv/Rtv arm. In conclusion, Rtv-boosed Sqv and Idv were found to have comparable antiretroviral effects in the doses studied.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12934178 DOI: 10.1086/377288
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Infect Dis ISSN: 0022-1899 Impact factor: 5.226