Literature DB >> 12933590

Donor CMV serologic status and outcome of CMV-seropositive recipients after unrelated donor stem cell transplantation: an EBMT megafile analysis.

Per Ljungman1, Ronald Brand, Hermann Einsele, Francesco Frassoni, Dietger Niederwieser, Catherine Cordonnier.   

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) has been a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). The importance of the recipient's serologic status is paramount. However, the importance of the donor's serologic status in CMV-seropositive recipients is controversial. We analyzed the influence of the donor's CMV status in a large cohort of patients. A total of 7018 patients seropositive for CMV reported to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) were included; 5910 patients had undergone HLA-identical sibling SCT and 1108 patients had undergone unrelated donor SCT. Univariate and multivariate proportional hazards models were constructed for survival, event-free survival, transplant-related mortality, and relapse incidence. Patients receiving grafts from CMV-seropositive HLA-identical sibling donors had the same survival as patients grafted from seronegative donors (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; P =.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.14). However, unrelated donor stem cell (SC) transplant recipients receiving grafts from CMV-seropositive donors had an improved 5-year survival (35% versus 27%; HR = 0.8; P =.006), an improved event-free survival (30% versus 22%; HR = 0.8; P =.01), and a reduced transplant-related mortality (49% versus 62%; HR = 0.7; P <.001). There was no influence on the relapse incidence. The effects of donor CMV status remained in multivariate analyses. The effect of donor status was different among different disease categories. In patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), T-cell depletion abrogated the beneficial effect of donor status, suggesting that the effect is mediated through transfer of donor immunity. Our data suggest that donor CMV status influences outcome of unrelated SCT. For a CMV-seropositive patient, a seropositive donor might be preferable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12933590     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  58 in total

Review 1.  How we treat cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  Michael Boeckh; Per Ljungman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  The immune response to cytomegalovirus in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  Miriam Ciáurriz; Amaya Zabalza; Lorea Beloki; Cristina Mansilla; Estela Pérez-Valderrama; Mercedes Lachén; Eva Bandrés; Eduardo Olavarría; Natalia Ramírez
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Priorities for CMV vaccine development.

Authors:  Philip R Krause; Stephanie R Bialek; Suresh B Boppana; Paul D Griffiths; Catherine A Laughlin; Per Ljungman; Edward S Mocarski; Robert F Pass; Jennifer S Read; Mark R Schleiss; Stanley A Plotkin
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-10-13       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 4.  The Past, Present, and Future of NK Cells in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Adoptive Transfer.

Authors:  Frank Cichocki; Michael R Verneris; Sarah Cooley; Veronika Bachanova; Claudio G Brunstein; Bruce R Blazar; John Wagner; Heinrich Schlums; Yenan T Bryceson; Daniel J Weisdorf; Jeffrey S Miller
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.291

5.  Co-transplantation of pure blood stem cells with antigen-specific but not bulk T cells augments functional immunity.

Authors:  Antonia M S Müller; Sumana Shashidhar; Natascha J Küpper; Holbrook E K Kohrt; Mareike Florek; Robert S Negrin; Janice M Brown; Judith A Shizuru
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Inhibition of protein geranylgeranylation and farnesylation protects against graft-versus-host disease via effects on CD4 effector T cells.

Authors:  Anne-Kathrin Hechinger; Kristina Maas; Christoph Dürr; Franziska Leonhardt; Gabriele Prinz; Reinhard Marks; Ulrike Gerlach; Maike Hofmann; Paul Fisch; Jürgen Finke; Hanspeter Pircher; Robert Zeiser
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 9.941

7.  Efficiency and risk factors for CMV transmission in seronegative hematopoietic stem cell recipients.

Authors:  Steven A Pergam; Hu Xie; Ravinder Sandhu; Margaret Pollack; Jeremy Smith; Terry Stevens-Ayers; Valeria Ilieva; Louise E Kimball; Meei-Li Huang; Tracy S Hayes; Lawrence Corey; Michael J Boeckh
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Single-agent GVHD prophylaxis with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide after myeloablative, HLA-matched BMT for AML, ALL, and MDS.

Authors:  Christopher G Kanakry; Hua-Ling Tsai; Javier Bolaños-Meade; B Douglas Smith; Ivana Gojo; Jennifer A Kanakry; Yvette L Kasamon; Douglas E Gladstone; William Matsui; Ivan Borrello; Carol Ann Huff; Lode J Swinnen; Jonathan D Powell; Keith W Pratz; Amy E DeZern; Margaret M Showel; Michael A McDevitt; Robert A Brodsky; Mark J Levis; Richard F Ambinder; Ephraim J Fuchs; Gary L Rosner; Richard J Jones; Leo Luznik
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  CMV-specific immune reconstitution following allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Emily Blyth; Barbara Withers; Leighton Clancy; David Gottlieb
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 5.882

Review 10.  Immunotherapy for transplantation-associated viral infections.

Authors:  Claire Roddie; Karl S Peggs
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.