Literature DB >> 12933556

Easy-to-implement Bayesian methods for dose-escalation studies in healthy volunteers.

J Whitehead1, S Patterson, D Webber, S Francis, Y Zhou.   

Abstract

In phase I clinical trials, experimental drugs are administered to healthy volunteers in order to establish their safety and to explore the relationship between the dose taken and the concentration found in plasma. Each volunteer receives a series of increasing single doses. In this paper a Bayesian decision procedure is developed for choosing the doses to give in the next round of the study, taking into account both prior information and the responses observed so far. The procedure seeks the optimal doses for learning about the dose-concentration relationship, subject to a constraint which reduces the risk of administering dangerously high doses. Individual volunteers receive more than one dose, and the pharmacokinetic responses observed are, after logarithmic transformation, treated as approximately normally distributed. Thus data analysis can be achieved by fitting linear mixed models. By expressing prior information as 'pseudo-data', and by maximizing over posterior distributions rather than taking expectations, a procedure which can be implemented using standard mixed model software is derived. Comparisons are made with existing approaches to the conduct of these studies, and the new method is illustrated using real and simulated data.To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Year:  2001        PMID: 12933556     DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/2.1.47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  6 in total

Review 1.  Learning from previous responses in phase I dose-escalation studies.

Authors:  J Whitehead; Y Zhou; N Stallard; S Todd; A Whitehead
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Adaptive Phase I clinical trial design using Markov models for conditional probability of toxicity.

Authors:  Laura L Fernandes; Jeremy M G Taylor; Susan Murray
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 1.051

3.  Statistical issues in first-in-human studies on BIA 10-2474: Neglected comparison of protocol against practice.

Authors:  Sheila M Bird; Rosemary A Bailey; Andrew P Grieve; Stephen Senn
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 1.894

4.  Bayesian methods for the design and interpretation of clinical trials in very rare diseases.

Authors:  Lisa V Hampson; John Whitehead; Despina Eleftheriou; Paul Brogan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Dose-finding methods for Phase I clinical trials using pharmacokinetics in small populations.

Authors:  Moreno Ursino; Sarah Zohar; Frederike Lentz; Corinne Alberti; Tim Friede; Nigel Stallard; Emmanuelle Comets
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.207

6.  Exposure driven dose escalation design with overdose control: Concept and first real life experience in an oncology phase I trial.

Authors:  Sandrine Micallef; Alexandre Sostelly; Jiawen Zhu; Paul G Baverel; Francois Mercier
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-02-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.