Literature DB >> 12933408

The antiemetic efficacy of droperidol added to morphine patient-controlled analgesia: a randomized, controlled, multicenter dose-finding study.

Xavier Culebras1, Jean-Baptiste Corpataux, Giovanni Gaggero, Martin R Tramèr.   

Abstract

The antiemetic dose response of droperidol when it is added to patient-controlled analgesia with morphine is not well known. We randomly allocated adults who received postoperative morphine patient-controlled analgesia (1-mg bolus, 5-min lockout) to one of four regimens: no droperidol (control) or 5, 15, or 50 micro g of droperidol per milligram of morphine. Efficacy and adverse effects were recorded during 24 h and were analyzed with number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm with 95% confidence intervals. Data from 82 controls, 82 patients receiving droperidol 5 micro g, 82 receiving droperidol 15 micro g, and 83 receiving droperidol 50 micro g were analyzed. Average consumption of droperidol per 24 h was 0.2 mg with the 5- micro g regimen, 0.61 mg with the 15- micro g regimen, and 2.04 mg with the 50- micro g regimen. In controls, the incidence of nausea was 48.8%; with droperidol 5 micro g, it was 42.7% (NNT compared with control, 16 [95% confidence interval, 4.7 to -11]); with 15 micro g, it was 32.9% (NNT, 6.3 [3.3-100]); and with 50 micro g, it was 21.7% (NNT, 3.7 [2.4 to 7.6]). In controls, the incidence of vomiting was 24.4%; with droperidol 5 micro g, it was 23.2% (NNT compared with control, 82 [7 to -8.5]); with 15 micro g, it was 22.0% (NNT, 41 [6.5 to -9.6]); and with 50 micro g, it was 12% (NNT, 8.1 [4.2-142]). In controls, the incidence of pruritus was 12.2%; with droperidol 5 micro g, it was 6.1% (NNT compared with control, 16 [6.7 to -37]); and with 15 and 50 micro g, it was 2.4% (NNT, 10 [5.7-52]). In controls, the incidence of sedation was 2.4%; with droperidol 5 micro g, it was 8.5% (number needed to harm (NNH) compared with control, 16 [7.7 to -123]); with 15 micro g, it was 6.1% (NNH, 27 [10 to -40]); and with 50 micro g, it was 18.1% (NNH, 6.4 [4.1-15]). There were no extrapyramidal symptoms and no cardiac adverse events. There was no difference in patient satisfaction. The optimal antiemetic dose of droperidol is 15-50 micro g/mg of morphine. Larger doses may have more antivomiting efficacy but are likely to be unacceptably sedating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12933408     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000078806.53162.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  8 in total

Review 1.  Intravenous droperidol: a review of its use in the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Kate McKeage; Dene Simpson; Antona J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Number needed to treat (or harm).

Authors:  Martin R Tramèr; Bernhard Walder
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Patient-controlled analgesia in the management of postoperative pain.

Authors:  Mona Momeni; Manuela Crucitti; Marc De Kock
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  [Postoperative nausea and vomiting].

Authors:  C C Apfel; N Roewer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  [Postoperative nausea and vomiting].

Authors:  M R Tramèr
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie Weibel; Gerta Rücker; Leopold Hj Eberhart; Nathan L Pace; Hannah M Hartl; Olivia L Jordan; Debora Mayer; Manuel Riemer; Maximilian S Schaefer; Diana Raj; Insa Backhaus; Antonia Helf; Tobias Schlesinger; Peter Kienbaum; Peter Kranke
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-10-19

7.  Prophylaxis of intra- and postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients during cesarean section in spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Matthias Voigt; Christian W Fröhlich; Christiane Hüttel; Peter Kranke; Jan Mennen; Oliver Boessneck; Christian Lenz; Thalia Erbes; Jürgen Ernst; Heinz Kerger
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2013-11-14

8.  An Audit of Changes in Outcomes of Acute Pain Service: Evolution Over the Last 2 Decades.

Authors:  Sheng Jia Low; Stanley Sau Ching Wong; Qiu Qiu; Yvonne Lee; Timmy Chi Wing Chan; Michael G Irwin; Chi Wai Cheung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.