Literature DB >> 12932501

Assessment of the aesthetic quality of a selection of beaches in the Firth of Forth, Scotland.

S E Somerville1, K L Miller, J M Mair.   

Abstract

The aesthetic quality of fourteen beaches in the Firth of Forth, Scotland was surveyed between May and July 2002 using a protocol designed by the UK's National Aquatic Litter Group (NALG). Local authority beach cleaning regimes influence the amount of litter found on beaches. Frequent and thorough beach cleaning is necessary to maintain high aesthetic standards. Bathing and amenity beaches achieved higher aesthetic quality than non-bathing and non-amenity beaches. The aesthetic quality of rural and urban beaches was very similar. The NALG protocol appears more complicated to use than other beach litter surveys. However, the classification system generates results that are easily interpreted by the general public. Furthermore, the NALG protocol could be combined with coastal zone management plans as a useful environmental performance indicator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12932501     DOI: 10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00126-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  4 in total

1.  Marine debris contamination along undeveloped tropical beaches from northeast Brazil.

Authors:  Isaac R Santos; Ana Cláudia Friedrich; Juliana Assunção Ivar do Sul
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Monitoring the abundance of plastic debris in the marine environment.

Authors:  Peter G Ryan; Charles J Moore; Jan A van Franeker; Coleen L Moloney
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Documenting the density of subtidal marine debris across multiple marine and coastal habitats.

Authors:  Stephen D A Smith; Robert J Edgar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Estimates of marine debris accumulation on beaches are strongly affected by the temporal scale of sampling.

Authors:  Stephen D A Smith; Ana Markic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.