Literature DB >> 12931940

Differences in cognitive distortions between problem and social gamblers.

Jackie Joukhador1, Fiona Maccallum, Alex Blaszczynski.   

Abstract

The cognitive model of gambling argues that irrational beliefs and erroneous perceptions including illusions of control, superstitious beliefs, expectancies of winning, attributional biases, selective memory, and entrapment play a pivotal role in the development and maintenance of impaired control over patterns of gambling behaviours. Assessment strategies using self-report, behavioural inferences, and verbalizations produced by 'thinking aloud' techniques, and the effectiveness of treatment interventions designed to correct cognitive distortions have provided substantive empirical evidence supporting this model. However, research has yet to measure such differences between the quality, intensity, or conviction of specific dysfunctional beliefs held by problem in contrast to social gamblers. At the theoretical level, the absence of such demonstrable differences would undermine the validity of the cognitive explanatory model. Based on a review of the available literature, a preliminary measure to assess differences in irrational gambling beliefs was constructed and administered to a convenience sample of 56 problem gamblers and 52 social gamblers. In support of the cognitive model, analysis indicated that, compared to social gamblers, problem gamblers endorsed more irrational beliefs across all domains except for the variable of 'denial'. Implications for research issues relevant to the identification of irrational beliefs that may be subjected to challenge within a cognitive therapy paradigm are mentioned.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12931940     DOI: 10.2466/pr0.2003.92.3c.1203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rep        ISSN: 0033-2941


  25 in total

1.  Superstitious beliefs in gambling among problem and non-problem gamblers: preliminary data.

Authors:  Jackie Joukhador; Alex Blaszczynski; Fiona Maccallum
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2004

Review 2.  Mindfulness and problem gambling: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Steven M de Lisle; Nicki A Dowling; J Sabura Allen
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2012-12

3.  Research of the Holiday kind: Tabulating Ingestion of Mocha Solution (TIMS): a longitudinal prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gregory Staios; Waqas U Khan; Lina Chiuccariello; Laurie H Sellings; Kim De Sousa; Shan Wang; Steven Lo; Alexander K Elkader
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Stacked Deck: an effective, school-based program for the prevention of problem gambling.

Authors:  Robert J Williams; Robert T Wood; Shawn R Currie
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2010-06

5.  Differences in cognitive distortions between pathological and non-pathological gamblers with preferences for chance or skill games.

Authors:  Helga Myrseth; Geir Scott Brunborg; Magnus Eidem
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2010-12

6.  Erroneous gambling-related beliefs as illusions of primary and secondary control: a confirmatory factor analysis.

Authors:  Anastasia Ejova; Paul H Delfabbro; Daniel J Navarro
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-03

7.  Adaptation study of the Turkish version of the Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS-T).

Authors:  K Arcan; A N Karanci
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-03

8.  Poker mania and problem gambling: a study of distorted cognitions, motivation and alexithymia.

Authors:  Dana V Mitrovic; Jac Brown
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2009-08-01

Review 9.  Decision-making during gambling: an integration of cognitive and psychobiological approaches.

Authors:  Luke Clark
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  The use of protective behaviors in relation to gambling among college students.

Authors:  Ty W Lostutter; Melissa A Lewis; Jessica M Cronce; Clayton Neighbors; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.