Literature DB >> 12931906

Efficacy of alum and coal combustion by-products in stabilizing manure phosphorus.

Z Dou1, G Y Zhang, W L Stout, J D Toth, J D Ferguson.   

Abstract

Animal manures contain large amounts of soluble phosphorus (P), which is prone to runoff losses when manure is surface-applied. Here we report the efficacy of alum and three coal combustion by-products in reducing P solubility when added to dairy, swine, or broiler litter manures in a laboratory incubation study. Compared with unamended controls, alum effectively reduced readily soluble P, determined in water extracts of moist manure samples with 1 h of shaking, for all three manures. The reduction ranged from 80 to 99% at treatment rates of 100 to 250 g alum kg(-1) manure dry matter. The fluidized bed combustion fly ash (FBC) reduced readily soluble P by 50 to 60% at a rate of 400 g kg(-1) for all three manures. Flue gas desulfurization by-product (FGD) reduced readily soluble P by nearly 80% when added to swine manure and broiler litter at 150 and 250 g kg(-1). Another by-product, anthracite refuse fly ash (ANT), was ineffective for all three manures. In all cases, reduction in readily soluble P is primarily associated with inorganic phosphorus (P(i)) with little change in organic phosphorus (P(o)). Sequential extraction results indicate that the by-product treatments shifted manure P from H2O-P into a less vulnerable fraction, NaHCO3 - P, while the alum treatment shifted the P into even more stable forms, mostly NaOH-P. Such shifts in P fractions would have little influence on P availability for crops over the long-term but would retard and reduce potential losses of P following manure applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12931906     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2003.1490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  5 in total

1.  Effect of industrial waste products on phosphorus mobilisation and biomass production in abattoir wastewater irrigated soil.

Authors:  Balaji Seshadri; Anitha Kunhikrishnan; Nanthi Bolan; Ravi Naidu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Mechanisms of Phosphorus Removal by Phosphorus Sorbing Materials.

Authors:  Zhixuan Qin; Amy L Shober; Kirk G Scheckel; Chad J Penn; Kathryn C Turner
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.751

3.  Chemical amendment of pig slurry: control of runoff related risks due to episodic rainfall events up to 48 h after application.

Authors:  Cornelius J O' Flynn; Mark G Healy; Paul Wilson; Nyncke J Hoekstra; Shane M Troy; Owen Fenton
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Alternative amendment for soluble phosphorus removal from poultry litter.

Authors:  Konstantinos C Makris; Dibyendu Sarkar; Jason Salazar; Pravin Punamiya; Rupali Datta
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Phosphorus leaching from a sandy soil in the presence of modified and un-modified adsorbents.

Authors:  Somayeh Moharami; Mohsen Jalali
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.513

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.