Literature DB >> 12931809

Primary and revision lumbar discectomy. A 16-year review from one centre.

C V J Morgan-Hough1, P W Jones, S M Eisenstein.   

Abstract

We present a review of 553 patients who underwent surgery for intractable sciatica ascribed to prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc. One surgeon in one institution undertook or supervised all the operations over a period of 16 years. The total number of primary discectomies included in the study was 531, of which 42 subsequently required a second operation for recurrent sciatica, giving a revision rate of 7.9%. Factors associated with reoperation were analysed. A contained disc protrusion was almost three times more likely to need revision surgery, compared with extruded or sequestrated discs. Patients with primary protrusions had a significantly greater straight-leg raise and reduced incidence of positive neurological findings compared with those with extruded or sequestrated discs. These patients should therefore be selected out clinically and treated by a more enthusiastic conservative programme, since they are three times more likely to require revision surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12931809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  33 in total

1.  How Much Work Effort is Involved in Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion?

Authors:  Tara Garber; Charles G T Ledonio; David W Polly
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-11-06

2.  Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for recurrent disc herniation.

Authors:  Dong Yeob Lee; Chan Shik Shim; Yong Ahn; Young-Geun Choi; Ho Jin Kim; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-12-31

3.  Laser-assisted endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy for failed back surgery syndrome in elderly patients.

Authors:  Yong Ahn; Han Joong Keum; Sang Ha Shin; Jung Ju Choi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Reoperation of decompression alone or decompression plus fusion surgeries for degenerative lumbar diseases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Zhao Lang; Jing-Sheng Li; Felix Yang; Yan Yu; Kamran Khan; Louis G Jenis; Thomas D Cha; James D Kang; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Risk factors for the need of surgical treatment of a first recurrent lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Ratko Yurac; Juan J Zamorano; Fernando Lira; Diego Valiente; Vicente Ballesteros; Alejandro Urzúa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Combined thrombin and autologous blood for repair of lumbar durotomy.

Authors:  Wael Mohamed Mohamed Moussa; Hisham A Aboul-Enein
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Artificial intelligence predicts disk re-herniation following lumbar microdiscectomy: development of the "RAD" risk profile.

Authors:  Garrett K Harada; Zakariah K Siyaji; G Michael Mallow; Alexander L Hornung; Fayyazul Hassan; Bryce A Basques; Haseeb A Mohammed; Arash J Sayari; Dino Samartzis; Howard S An
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Effectiveness of a mucolythic agent as a local adjuvant in revision lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Vincenzo Denaro; Alberto Di Martino; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Vincenzo Costa; Rocco Papalia; Francisco Forriol; Luca Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Treatment of Recurrent Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Doniel Drazin; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Lutfi Al-Khouja; Dongyan Yang; Patrick Johnson; Terrence Kim; Maxwell Boakye
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-05-23

10.  Primary and revision lumbar discectomy: a three-year review from one center.

Authors:  K N Acharya; T S Senthil Nathan; J Renjit Kumar; K Venugopal Menon
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.