Literature DB >> 12931263

[Which functional diagnostic tools do German coloproctologists favour?].

D Bussen1, M Kraemer, M Sailer, K-H Fuchs, A Thiede.   

Abstract

AIM: We tried to evaluate the role of anorectal functional diagnostic tools according to the judgement of German coloproctologists.
METHOD: Questionnaires concerning accuracy of different diagnostic tests were sent to 585 physicians specialized in coloproctology.
RESULTS: 261 (44.6 %) completed forms were returned. An analysis of the answers revealed that endorectal sonography is widely (73 %) regarded as useful and reliable diagnostic tool. Though manometry is still frequently used, only 50.5 % of the coloproctologists made their decision concerning the further treatment depending on the results of this method. Other radiologic methods as defecography and colon transit time are still regularly performed, though video-defecography is not accepted by most coloproctologists. Neurological investigations as pudendal nerve terminal latency, surface-EMG and needle-EMG are exclusively applied in specialized departments. DISCUSSION: Regarding the variety of diagnostic tools and its different appraisal a consensus should be defined. The usefulness of neurological examination techniques needs to be clarified before their performance can be recommended for a wide-spread routine work up.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12931263     DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-41375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Chir        ISSN: 0044-409X            Impact factor:   0.942


  1 in total

Review 1.  [Differential diagnosis in descending perineum syndrome].

Authors:  O Schwandner; F Poschenrieder; H-B Gehl; H-P Bruch
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.955

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.