Literature DB >> 12930813

Representation of cardinal contour overlaps less with representation of nearby angles in cat visual cortex.

Gang Wang1, Shan Ding, Kazutomo Yunokuchi.   

Abstract

Extensive attempts have been made to explain the neurobiological basis of the greater sensitivity of the visual system to vertically or horizontally oriented information than to information presented at oblique angles. However, investigators have largely ignored the overlap of the representation of a given angle with the representation of nearby angles. Recordings based on intrinsic optical signals were obtained in area 17 from 12 adult cats during the presentation of contours in various orientations. A method investigating both amplitude and statistical significance of changes was proposed to evaluate the orientation tuning properties for cell populations in the central area retinotopically corresponding to 0-15 degrees of visual field. Cardinal orientations were found to activate significantly greater areas in the exposed cortical area than the areas activated by oblique orientations. Areas activated by cardinal or oblique contours and those separated from them by 10 degrees were compared. A significantly lower degree of overlap was seen between areas activated by presentation of cardinal contours and areas activated by neighboring orientations compared with those for oblique orientations which overlapped more extensively with neighboring orientations. In addition, areas activated only by cardinal contours were significantly larger than areas activated only by oblique contours. These results demonstrated in cell population level that more cells prefer horizontal or vertical orientations, and these cells are tuned more sharply than oblique selective cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12930813     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00219.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

1.  Unequal representation of cardinal vs. oblique orientations in the middle temporal visual area.

Authors:  Xiangmin Xu; Christine E Collins; Ilya Khaytin; Jon H Kaas; Vivien A Casagrande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Differential human brain activation by vertical and horizontal global visual textures.

Authors:  Jane E Aspell; John Wattam-Bell; Janette Atkinson; Oliver J Braddick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Optogenetically induced low-frequency correlations impair perception.

Authors:  Anirvan Nandy; Jonathan J Nassi; Monika P Jadi; John Reynolds
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Specificity of neuronal responses in primary visual cortex is modulated by interhemispheric corticocortical input.

Authors:  Kerstin E Schmidt; Stephen G Lomber; Giorgio M Innocenti
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Visuospatial performance in patients with statistically-defined mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Victor Wasserman; Sheina Emrani; Emily F Matusz; Jamie Peven; Seana Cleary; Catherine C Price; Terrie Beth Ginsberg; Rodney Swenson; Kenneth M Heilman; Melissa Lamar; David J Libon
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.475

6.  A computational study of how orientation bias in the lateral geniculate nucleus can give rise to orientation selectivity in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Levin Kuhlmann; Trichur R Vidyasagar
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-11

7.  Orientation anisotropies in macaque visual areas.

Authors:  Chen Fang; Xingya Cai; Haidong D Lu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 8.  The visual callosal connection: a connection like any other?

Authors:  Kerstin E Schmidt
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.599

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.