Literature DB >> 12930621

In vitro and in vivo developmental potential of nuclear transfer embryos using bovine cumulus cells prepared in four different conditions.

Satoshi Akagi1, Seiya Takahashi, Noritaka Adachi, Kiyotoshi Hasegawa, Toru Sugawara, Yutaka Tozuka, Eiji Yamamoto, Manabu Shimizu, Yoshiaki Izaike.   

Abstract

We examined the effect of culture of donor cells on nuclear transfer efficiency using bovine cumulus cells treated with four different conditions: (1). group A, the cells removed from cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) after aspiration of ovarian follicles; (2). group B, the cells removed from COC after in vitro maturation; (3). group C, the cells cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) for 3 days after some subculture; and (4). group D, the cells cultured in DMEM with 0.5% FBS for an additional 5 days. Analysis of cell cycle using flow cytometry revealed that the relative proportion of donor cells at G0/G1 phase of cell cycle was 89.7% in group A, 89.5% in group B, 76.0% in group C, and 90.6% in group D. The developmental rates to blastocyst stage in groups C (45.3%) and D (46.4%) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than in groups A (17.5%) and B (31.9%). After transfer of blastocysts produced in each group, nine of 24 recipients became pregnant on day 30. A total of five live calves were obtained from cumulus cells in all groups (group A [n = 1], group B [n = 1], group C [n = 2], and group D [n = 1]).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12930621     DOI: 10.1089/153623003322234696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cloning Stem Cells        ISSN: 1536-2302


  6 in total

1.  Accurate dispensing system for single oocytes using air ejection.

Authors:  Lin Feng; Yiling Sun; Chisato Ohsumi; Fumihito Arai
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  On-chip rotational manipulation of microbeads and oocytes using acoustic microstreaming generated by oscillating asymmetrical microstructures.

Authors:  Lin Feng; Bin Song; Yuanyuan Chen; Shuzhang Liang; Yuguo Dai; Qiang Zhou; Dixiao Chen; Xue Bai; Yanmin Feng; Yonggang Jiang; Deyuan Zhang; Fumihito Arai
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 3.  Mitochondrial DNA transmission and confounding mitochondrial influences in cloned cattle and pigs.

Authors:  Kumiko Takeda
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-10

Review 4.  Factors affecting the development of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos in Cattle.

Authors:  Satoshi Akagi; Kazutsugu Matsukawa; Seiya Takahashi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.214

5.  Correction of a Disease Mutation using CRISPR/Cas9-assisted Genome Editing in Japanese Black Cattle.

Authors:  Mitsumi Ikeda; Shuichi Matsuyama; Satoshi Akagi; Katsuhiro Ohkoshi; Sho Nakamura; Shiori Minabe; Koji Kimura; Misa Hosoe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Combined refinements to somatic cell nuclear transfer methods improve porcine embryo development.

Authors:  Thanh Quang Dang-Nguyen; David Wells; Seiki Haraguchi; Nguyen Thi Men; Hiep Thi Nguyen; Junko Noguchi; Hiroyuki Kaneko; Kazuhiro Kikuchi
Journal:  J Reprod Dev       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.214

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.