Literature DB >> 12930572

Ovarian responses to recombinant FSH or HMG in normogonadotrophic women following pituitary desensitization by a depot GnRH agonist for assisted reproduction.

Juan Balasch1, Joana Peñarrubia, Francisco Fábregues, Ester Vidal, Roser Casamitjana, Dolors Manau, Francisco Carmona, Montserrat Creus, Juan A Vanrell.   

Abstract

At present, there is considerable debate about the utility of supplemental LH in assisted reproduction treatment. In order to explore this, the present authors used a depot gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) protocol combined with recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) or human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The response to either rhFSH (75 IU FSH/ampoule; group rhFSH, 25 patients) or HMG (75 IU FSH and 75 IU LH/ampoule; group HMG, 25 patients) was compared in normo-ovulatory women suppressed with a depot triptorelin injection and candidates for ICSI. A fixed regimen of 150 IU rhFSH or HMG was administered in the first 14 days of treatment. Treatment was monitored with transvaginal pelvic ultrasonographic scans and serum measurement of FSH, LH, oestradiol, androstenedione, testosterone, progesterone, inhibin A, inhibin B and human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) at 2-day intervals. Although oestradiol serum concentrations on the day of HCG injection were similar, both the duration of treatment and the per cycle gonadotrophin dose were lower in group HMG. In the initial 16 days of gonadotrophin treatment, the area under the curve (AUC) of LH, oestradiol, androstenedione and inhibin B were higher in group HMG; no differences were seen for the remaining hormones measured, including the inhibin B:inhibin A ratio. The dynamics of ovarian follicle development during gonadotrophin treatment were similar in both study groups, but there were more leading follicles (>17 mm in diameter) on the day of HCG injection in the rhFSH group. The number of oocytes, mature oocytes and good quality zygotes and embryos obtained were significantly increased in the rhFSH group. It is concluded that in IVF patients undergoing pituitary desensitization with a depot agonist preparation, supplemental LH may be required in terms of treatment duration and gonadotrophin consumption. However, both oocyte, embryo yield and quality were significantly higher with the use of rhFSH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12930572     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61726-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  9 in total

1.  Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation to recombinant follicle-stimulation hormone during induced ovarian stimulation in the GnRH-agonist protocol: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  João Batista A Oliveira; Ana Lucia Mauri; Claudia G Petersen; Anice M C Martins; João Cornicelli; Mario Cavanha; Anagloria Pontes; Ricardo L R Baruffi; José G Franco
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Cumulative exposure to high estradiol levels during the follicular phase of IVF cycles negatively affects implantation.

Authors:  Murat Arslan; Silvina Bocca; Ebru Ozturk Arslan; Hakan E Duran; Laurel Stadtmauer; Sergio Oehninger
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Recombinant follitropin alfa/lutropin alfa in fertility treatment.

Authors:  Ahmed Gibreel; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2010-02-04

Review 4.  Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone produces more oocytes with a lower total dose per cycle in assisted reproductive technologies compared with highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Lehert; Joan C Schertz; Diego Ezcurra
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Comparative gene expression profiling in human cumulus cells according to ovarian gonadotropin treatments.

Authors:  Said Assou; Delphine Haouzi; Hervé Dechaud; Anna Gala; Alice Ferrières; Samir Hamamah
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Results from adding recombinant LH for assisted reproductive technology treatment: A randomized control trial.

Authors:  Mohammad-Hossein Razi; Fereshteh Mohseni; Razieh Dehghani Firouzabadi; Sima Janati; Nahid Yari; Sahabeh Etebary
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-02

Review 7.  Urinary Versus Recombinant Gonadotropins for Ovarian Stimulation in Women Undergoing Treatment with Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Ameet Patki; Himanshu Bavishi; Chandravati Kumari; Jayarani Kamraj; M Venugopal; K U Kunjimoideen; Poornima Nadkarni; Samundi Sankari; Sunil Chaudhary; M J Sangeeta; C S Manjunath; Pratap Kumar
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

Review 8.  Human recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) compared to urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction: a literature review and cost evaluation.

Authors:  P E Levi Setti; C Alviggi; G L Colombo; C Pisanelli; C Ripellino; S Longobardi; P L Canonico; G De Placido
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 9.  A review of luteinising hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin when used in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Diego Ezcurra; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 5.211

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.