Literature DB >> 12930475

The ecology of eating: smaller portion sizes in France Than in the United States help explain the French paradox.

Paul Rozin1, Kimberly Kabnick, Erin Pete, Claude Fischler, Christy Shields.   

Abstract

Part of the "French paradox" can be explained by the fact that the French eat less than Americans. We document that French portion sizes are smaller in comparable restaurants, in the sizes of individual portions of foods (but not other items) in supermarkets, in portions specified in cookbooks, and in the prominence of "all you can eat" restaurants in dining guides. We also present data, from observations at McDonald's, that the French take longer to eat than Americans. Our results suggest that in the domain of eating, and more generally, more attention should be paid to ecological factors, even though their mechanism of operation is transparent, and hence less revealing of fundamental psychological processes. Ironically, although the French eat less than Americans, they seem to eat for a longer period of time, and hence have more food experience. The French can have their cake and eat it as well.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12930475     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.02452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  20 in total

1.  Leveraging the happy meal effect: Substituting food with modest nonfood incentives decreases portion size choice.

Authors:  Martin Reimann; Antoine Bechara; Deborah MacInnis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2015-09

2.  The Women on the Move Through Activity and Nutrition (WOMAN) study: final 48-month results.

Authors:  Lewis H Kuller; Kelley K Pettee Gabriel; Laura S Kinzel; Darcy A Underwood; Margaret B Conroy; Yuefang Chang; Rachel H Mackey; Daniel Edmundowicz; Kim S Tyrrell; Alhaji M Buhari; Andrea M Kriska
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 5.002

3.  Residential mobility, self-concept, and positive affect in social interactions.

Authors:  Shigehiro Oishi; Janetta Lun; Gary D Sherman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-07

4.  The Attitudes and Patterns of Eating (APE) Questionnaire: development and factor analysis in a U.S. adolescent community sample.

Authors:  D Quirk-Baillot; M F Flament; A Allen; N Obeid; B Remy; B Falissard; N Godart
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 5.  Portion size and obesity.

Authors:  M Barbara E Livingstone; L Kirsty Pourshahidi
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 8.701

6.  CaPSCA: Evaluation of a Brief Cancer Prevention Education Programme to Promote Balanced Diet in French School Children.

Authors:  Laura J Rennie; Cécile Bazillier-Bruneau; Jacques Rouëssé
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Reference amounts utilised in front of package nutrition labelling; impact on product healthfulness evaluations.

Authors:  M M Raats; S Hieke; C Jola; C Hodgkins; J Kennedy; J Wills
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Portion size: review and framework for interventions.

Authors:  Ingrid Hm Steenhuis; Willemijn M Vermeer
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  Child and parent characteristics related to parental feeding practices. A cross-cultural examination in the US and France.

Authors:  Dara R Musher-Eizenman; Blandine de Lauzon-Guillain; Shayla C Holub; Emeline Leporc; Marie Aline Charles
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 10.  Does food marketing need to make us fat? A review and solutions.

Authors:  Pierre Chandon; Brian Wansink
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.846

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.