Literature DB >> 12930182

A comparison of 3 hand-held dynamometers used to measure hip abduction strength.

Paula Click Fenter1, James W Bellew, Tonya Pitts, Rachael Kay.   

Abstract

Quantification of strength with hand-held dynamometers is commonplace. Hand-held dynamometers offer ease of use; however, previous investigations have shown much variability between repeated measures using the same dynamometer. Even less is known regarding the degree of variability between various dynamometers. Therefore, the intent of this investigation was to compare measures of hip abduction strength recorded with 3 different but commonly used hand-held dynamometers, specifically the Microfet 2 Load Cell, Jamar Hand-Held, and Dial Push-Pull Gauge. Maximal isometric hip abduction strength was recorded in 10 women (27.6 +/- 6.2 years) over 3 consecutive days using a different device each day. A significant difference in recorded force was noted between the devices (p < 0.001) as the Microfet showed significantly less force than the others. This was supported by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from 0.277 to 0.688. These data suggest that consideration must be given to using the same dynamometer when quantifying strength over repeated sessions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12930182     DOI: 10.1519/1533-4287(2003)017<0531:acohdu>2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  2 in total

1.  Hip strength and knee pain in females.

Authors:  Jennifer Rowe; Lisa Shafer; Kathryn Kelley; Nicole West; Terre Dunning; Robert Smith; Douglas J Mattson
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2007-08

2.  The Takei Handheld Dynamometer: An Effective Clinical Outcome Measure Tool for Hand and Wrist Function in Boxing.

Authors:  Ian Gatt; Sophie Smith-Moore; Charlie Steggles; Mike Loosemore
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-05-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.