Literature DB >> 12928686

Driving ability after pupillary dilatation.

S Goel1, P Maharajan, C Chua, B Dong, M Butcher, P Bagga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Royal College of Ophthalmologists' guidelines and Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) recommend that a patient should not drive with dilated pupils based on the rationale that vision may be compromised in acuity and ability to tolerate glare. Arguments exist against these recommendations suggesting that pupillary dilatation does not have any real bearings on driving ability. Aim To determine the effects of pupillary dilatation on the ability to drive.
METHODS: The study was randomised and prospective. A total of 28 patients had their visual parameters (distance vision, near vision, licence plate reading at 20 m or shorter, and glare) measured and analysed pre- and post-tropicamide 1% dilatation. Paired two-tailed Student's t-test and chi(2)-test were used in the analysis.
RESULTS: At 20 min, following instillation of one drop of tropicamide 1% there is a significant reduction in visual acuity (VA), for distance Snellen and near. There is a significant reduction in the number of people who could read the licence plate at 20 m. Subjective glare assessment changed from 'none' (average score) in the undilated state to 'mild' in the dilated states. The overall patient feedback indicated that a significant 14% believed they would find it difficult to drive postdilatation.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the rationale behind disallowing driving following pupillary dilatation. The risks to safe driving are proved significant as a result of significant reduction in visual quality and quantity after dilatation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12928686     DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  The legal requirement for driving in the United Kingdom is met following pupil dilatation.

Authors:  J Siderov; D Mehta; R Virk
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Comparison of experiences and preferences following non-invasive cardiovascular risk procedures: a cross-sectional survey in participants with and without diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Anchal Lal; Neha Dave; Samia Kazi; Paul Mitchell; Aravinda Thiagalingam
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2022-03-14

3.  Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Ratio Is Improved When Using a Digital, Nonmydriatic Fundus Camera Onsite in a Diabetes Outpatient Clinic.

Authors:  Pia Roser; Hannes Kalscheuer; Jan B Groener; Daniel Lehnhoff; Roman Klein; Gerd U Auffarth; Peter P Nawroth; Florian Schuett; Gottfried Rudofsky
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.011

4.  Prediction for Cycloplegic Refractive Error in Chinese School Students: Model Development and Validation.

Authors:  Jianyong Wang; Xinyi Wang; Hans M Gao; Huiyan Zhang; Ying Yang; Fang Gu; Xin Zheng; Lei Gu; Jianyao Huang; Jia Meng; Juanjuan Li; Lei Gao; Ronghua Zhang; Jianqin Shen; Gui-Shuang Ying; Hongguang Cui
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.283

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.