Literature DB >> 12927459

Formocresol mutagenicity following primary tooth pulp therapy: an in vivo study.

P A Zarzar1, A Rosenblatt, C S Takahashi, P L Takeuchi, L A Costa Júnior.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether formocresol, in Buckley's original formulation, is mutagenic in vivo to lymphocyte cultures obtained from the peripheral blood of children aged from 5 to 10 years old. These children were recruited from those attending the dental clinics of Recife City Council and the University of Pernambuco School of Dentistry, Brazil.
METHODS: The sample comprised 20 children who had primary teeth with cariously exposed vital pulps. Two venous blood samples were collected (6-8 ml) from each child, the first prior to vital pulpotomy (control group) and the second 24 h after pulpotomy (treated group). This research is a case-control study. The peripheral lymphocytes were grown in a complete culture medium consisting of 78% RPMI 1640 medium (a), supplemented with streptomycin (0.01 mg/ml), penicillin (0.005 ml(-1)), 20% fetal bovine serum (b) and 2% phytohemagglutinin (c). The lymphocytes were assessed for chromosomal aberrations via a previously published method which was modified. The cytogenetic analysis was performed in a blind test, where the slides were codified by an annotator and the scorers did not know which group they were analyzing. For each sample, this envolved the analysis of 200 metaphases. The level of significance adopted in the statistical test was 5.0% (p<0.05).
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in clinical doses between the control and treated groups, using Wilcoxon's Signed Ranks test, for the chromosomal aberrations (P=0.251) and for the total chromosomal breaks (P=0.149). Although there were no statistically significant differences between the control and treated groups, Buckley's formocresol was mutagenic for one patient, raising doubt about the desirability of its use for pulpotomies in children.
CONCLUSIONS: The results revealed that, from a statistical standpoint, formocresol is not mutagenic. However, further investigations are required, preferably with a larger sample, in patients needing more than one pulpotomy in order to observe whether an increase in the quantity of the drug would increase the quantity of chromosome aberrations and also to verify individual susceptibility to chromosome alterations with the use of formocresol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12927459     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(03)00087-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of the genotoxic effects of formocresol application in vital pulp therapy of primary teeth: a clinical study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arnoldo Vasconcelos de Alencar Filho; Valdeci Elias Dos Santos Junior; Merilane da Silva Calixto; Neide Santos; Monica Vilela Heimer; Aronita Rosenblatt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  In vivo evaluation of the treatment outcome of pulpotomy in primary molars using diode laser, formocresol, and ferric sulphate.

Authors:  Basak Durmus; Ilknur Tanboga
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Long-term effectiveness of four pulpotomy techniques: 3-year randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Karin Christine Huth; Niran Hajek-Al-Khatar; Petra Wolf; Nicoleta Ilie; Reinhard Hickel; Ekaterini Paschos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Effect of LASER therapy Vs conventional techniques on clinical and radiographic outcomes of deciduous molar pulpotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vennila Chandran; Venkitachalam Ramanarayanan; Medhini Menon; Balagopal Varma; Vinita Sanjeevan
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2020-06-01

5.  Histopathological evaluation of pulpotomy with Er,Cr:YSGG laser vs formocresol.

Authors:  Lida Toomarian; Reza Fekrazad; Davood Sharifi; Mojdeh Baghaei; Hessam Rahimi; Behnam Eslami
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.161

6.  Clinical and Radiographic Success of Pulpotomy with MTA in Primary Molars: 30 Months Follow up.

Authors:  Roza Haghgoo; Farid Abbasi
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2010-11-15

7.  Evaluation of the restoration success of endodontic therapy of the primary molars.

Authors:  Zuhal Kirzioglu; Ozge Erken Gungor; Z Zahit Ciftci
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2011-10

8.  Clinical and radiographical evaluation of propolis and thymus vulgaris extracts compared with formocresol pulpotomy in human primary molars.

Authors:  Hesham Alolofi; Manal El-Sayed; Sherine Taha
Journal:  BDJ Open       Date:  2016-07-29

9.  Clinical, Radiological, and Histological Assessment of Magnetic Nanoparticles as Pulpotomy Medicament in Primary Molars.

Authors:  Harivinder R Konyala; Ajay R Mareddy; Niharika Puppala; N Venugopal Reddy; Manoj K Mallela; Keerthi P Susheela
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2018-08-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.