Literature DB >> 12927210

Role of central cholinergic receptor sub-types in spatial working memory: a five-arm maze task in mice provides evidence for a functional role of nicotinic receptors in mediating trace access processes.

T Maviel1, T P Durkin.   

Abstract

A delayed-matching spatial working memory protocol in a 5-arm maze was used to test the hypothesis of differential roles for central nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in mediating task performance. In experiment 1, using a within subjects-repeated design, groups of C57Bl/6 mice, previously trained to criterion with a 4 h retention interval separating presentation and test phases, received i.p. injections of either saline, scopolamine (0.8 mg/kg), mecamylamine (8.0 mg/kg), or the combination of scopolamine and mecamylamine before re-testing. Injections were given either, a) 15 min pre-presentation or, b) 30 s, c) 15 min, d) 3 h 45 min post-presentation in order to differentially affect the acquisition, trace maintenance and recall phases. Significant decreases in correct responses were observed for each drug treatment but the effects were a function of the time of treatment. Results of condition d), (i.e.15 min before retention test) confirm previous reports of severe disruption by each antagonist and their combination on retention. However, conditions a-c) show a constant disruption by scopolamine, increasing disruption by mecamylamine, whereas the combined treatment was without effect. Although the data show that central nicotinic and muscarinic antagonists both modulate working memory performance, they indicate first, that scopolamine-induced "amnesia" results, not from selective post-synaptic M1 muscarinic blockade but from indirect over-activation of nicotinic receptors. Second, the observation of high levels of retention although nicotinic and muscarinic receptors had undergone combined blockade during a large part of the retention interval is incompatible with the concept that test-induced activation of central cholinergic neurones mediates memory trace maintenance. Finally, taken with data from experiment 2, using a short (20 min) treatment-to-test interval, we conclude that central nicotinic receptors play a key role in attentional processes enabling working memory trace access during retrieval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12927210     DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(03)00403-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  5 in total

1.  Propranolol blocks chronic risperidone treatment-induced enhancement of spatial working memory performance of rats in a delayed matching-to-place water maze task.

Authors:  Ee Peng Lim; Vivek Verma; Rajini Nagarajah; Gavin S Dawe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Impaired spatial working memory and altered choline acetyltransferase (CHAT) immunoreactivity and nicotinic receptor binding in rats exposed to intermittent hypoxia during sleep.

Authors:  Barry W Row; Leila Kheirandish; Yu Cheng; Peter P Rowell; David Gozal
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Intrahippocampal blockade of nicotinic or muscarinic receptors fails to impair nonnavigational spatial memory in macaques.

Authors:  Elyssa M LaFlamme; Ludise Malkova; Patrick A Forcelli
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.154

Review 4.  Cholinergic modulation of spatial learning, memory and navigation.

Authors:  Nicola Solari; Balázs Hangya
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-19       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Protective effects of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase on neurotoxicity of aluminium applied into the CA1 sector of rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Marina D Jovanović; Ankica Jelenković; Ivana D Stevanović; Dubravko Bokonjić; Miodrag Colić; Natasa Petronijević; Danica B Stanimirović
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.375

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.