Literature DB >> 12927056

Mast cells in tissue response to dentistry materials: an adhesive resin, a calcium hydroxide and a glass ionomer cement.

R L De Oliveira Mussel1, E De Sá Silva, Andréa Monte Alto Costa, C A Mandarim-De-Lacerda.   

Abstract

Synthetic materials used in dentistry may trigger various inflammatory responses. In order to evaluate biocompatibility, standardized implants of Calcium Hydroxide (CH), Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) and Light-activated Dental Adhesive (LDA) were surgically introduced into Wistar rats' back bone. Six (experimental) animal groups, five each, and two Sham (S) groups were studied after 15 and 30 days from surgery. In each animal, the density of mast cells and interstitial fibrosis volume was evaluated by quantitative light microscopy. In addition, the interaction between the disk material and its fibrous capsule was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. The density of mast cells per area (N(A)[mast cells]) was lower in CH group than in LDA group. GIC group displayed N(A)[mast cells] results intermediate between CH and LDA groups (p<0.05). The smallest interstitial fibrosis volume density (Vv[f]) was observed in CH group, then in GIC group, while the greatest in LDA group. After 30 days, the fibrosis in LDA group was 30% higher than in CH group (p<0.05). In S group, discreet fibrosis restricted to surgical area was present, with few mast cells near the vessels. Significant interaction between fibrous capsule and the surrounding disk material was most evident in CH group. The implanted materials induced mast cell migration, distinct fibrosis development, suggesting that CH is the most biocompatible material among those tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12927056      PMCID: PMC6740275          DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2003.tb00216.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Mol Med        ISSN: 1582-1838            Impact factor:   5.310


  8 in total

1.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of silicated hydroxyapatite and impact of insulin adsorption.

Authors:  M Lasgorceix; A M Costa; E Mavropoulos; M Sader; M Calasans; M N Tanaka; A Rossi; C Damia; R Chotard-Ghodsnia; E Champion
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Use of a magnesium-based bone adhesive for flexor tendon-to-bone healing.

Authors:  Stavros Thomopoulos; Emmanouil Zampiakis; Rosalina Das; H Mike Kim; Matthew J Silva; Necat Havlioglu; Richard H Gelberman
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 3.  In vitro and in vivo studies on the toxicity of dental resin components: a review.

Authors:  Michel Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Reaction of rat subcutaneous connective tissue to resin composites polymerized with different light curing units and different lightening methods.

Authors:  Atiyeh Feiz; Farahnaz Arbabzadeh Zavareh; Seyed Mohammad Razavi; Hamid Badrian; Sepideh Dolatyar; Mansoureh Vajihi
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-06-14

5.  Role of mast cells in wound healing process after glass-fiber composite implant in rats.

Authors:  L F Rodella; Rita Rezzani; Barbara Buffoli; Francesca Bonomini; Sandra Tengattini; Laura Laffranchi; C Paganelli; P L Sapelli; Rossella Bianchi
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 5.310

6.  Biocompatibility of orthodontic adhesives in rat subcutaneous tissue.

Authors:  Rogério Lacerda dos Santos; Matheus Melo Pithon; Alline Birra Nolasco Fernandes; Márcia Grillo Cabral; Antônio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Histocompatibility of Dental Restorative Composite Resin Photopolymerized with a Novel Multifunctional Comonomer: A Histopathological Analysis in Rats.

Authors:  Jambai Sampathkumar Sivakumar; Ranganathan Ajay; Karuppiah Gokulapriyan; Natesan Thangaraj Deepa; Subramaniam Kalaiyarasu Vigneshwari; Shafie Ahamed
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

Review 8.  In vivo Biocompatibility and Bioactivity of Calcium Silicate-Based Bioceramics in Endodontics.

Authors:  Wencheng Song; Wei Sun; Lili Chen; Zhenglin Yuan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.