Literature DB >> 12926599

Comparison of plasma and interstitial fluid concentrations of doxycycline and meropenem following constant rate intravenous infusion in dogs.

Tara L Bidgood1, Mark G Papich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare plasma (total and unbound) and interstitial fluid (ISF) concentrations of doxycycline and meropenem in dogs following constant rate IV infusion of each drug. ANIMAL: 6 adult Beagles. PROCEDURE: Dogs were given a loading dose of doxycycline and meropenem followed by a constant rate IV infusion of each drug to maintain an 8-hour steady state concentration. Interstitial fluid was collected with an ultrafiltration device. Plasma and ISF were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography. Protein binding and lipophilicity were determined. Plasma data were analyzed by use of compartmental methods.
RESULTS: Compared with meropenem, doxycycline had higher protein binding (11.87% [previously published value] vs 91.75 +/- 0.63%) and lipophilicity (partition coefficients, 0.02 +/- 0.01 vs 0.68 +/- 0.05). A significant difference was found between ISF and plasma total doxycycline concentrations. No significant difference was found between ISF and plasma unbound doxycycline concentrations. Concentrations of meropenem in ISF and plasma (total and unbound) were similar. Plasma half-life, volume of distribution, and clearance were 4.56 +/- 0.57 hours, 0.65 +/- 0.82 L/kg, and 1.66 +/- 2.21 mL/min/kg, respectively, for doxycycline and 0.73 +/- 0.07 hours, 0.34 +/- 0.06 L/kg, and 5.65 +/- 2.76 mL/min/kg, respectively, for meropenem. The ISF half-life of doxycycline and meropenem was 4.94 +/- 0.67 and 2.31 +/- 0.36 hours, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The extent of protein binding determines distribution of doxycycline and meropenem into ISF. As a result of high protein binding, ISF doxycycline concentrations are lower than plasma total doxycycline concentrations. Concentrations of meropenem in ISF can be predicted from plasma total meropenem concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12926599     DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.1040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  5 in total

1.  Pharmacodynamics of doxycycline and tetracycline against Staphylococcus pseudintermedius: proposal of canine-specific breakpoints for doxycycline.

Authors:  Marit Gaastra Maaland; Mark G Papich; John Turnidge; Luca Guardabassi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Generation of Atoh1-rtTA transgenic mice: a tool for inducible gene expression in hair cells of the inner ear.

Authors:  Brandon C Cox; Jennifer A Dearman; Joseph Brancheck; Frederique Zindy; Martine F Roussel; Jian Zuo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Considerations for using minocycline vs doxycycline for treatment of canine heartworm disease.

Authors:  Mark G Papich
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Pharmacokinetic Profile of Doxycycline in Koala Plasma after Weekly Subcutaneous Injections for the Treatment of Chlamydiosis.

Authors:  Chien-Jung Chen; Amber Gillett; Rosemary Booth; Benjamin Kimble; Merran Govendir
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Systematic Review of the Pharmacological Evidence for the Selection of Antimicrobials in Bacterial Infections of the Central Nervous System in Dogs and Cats.

Authors:  Robert Hertzsch; Angelika Richter
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.