Literature DB >> 12925070

Endorectal ultrasound in rectal cancer.

M Hünerbein1.   

Abstract

Accurate staging of rectal carcinoma is crucial for planning surgery and the indication for adjuvant therapy. Although computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are very sensitive in the detection metastastic disease, local staging of rectal cancer with these techniques has been disappointing. Endorectal ultrasound (EUS) remains the most accurate method for staging of rectal cancer. High accuracy rates in the assessment of the depth of infiltration (T stage) (80-90%) and in the determination of the lymph node status (70-80%) have been confirmed in several studies. Continued research and development has made the instrumentation for EUS more accurate and user-friendly. New techniques that have contributed significantly to the evolution of EUS include three-dimensional EUS, high-frequency miniprobes and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy techniques. Further improvement can be expected by contrast enhancement with microbubbles and colour Doppler imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12925070     DOI: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00516.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  7 in total

Review 1.  Complete radiotherapy response in rectal cancer: A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Daniel G Couch; David M Hemingway
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Endorectal ultrasound: its role in the diagnosis and treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bret R Edelman; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-08

3.  Does a learning curve exist in endorectal two-dimensional ultrasound accuracy?

Authors:  A M Jadav; C Mumbi; S R Brown
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  [Present treatment strategies for rectal carcinoma].

Authors:  T Liersch; C Langer; B M Ghadimi; H Becker
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Atypical endoscopic features can be associated with metastasis in rectal carcinoid tumors.

Authors:  Byung Nyun Kim; Dae Kyung Sohn; Chang Won Hong; Kyung Su Han; Hee Jin Chang; Kyung Hae Jung; Seok-Byung Lim; Hyo Seong Choi; Seung-Yong Jeong; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Circulating lymphangiogenic growth factors in gastrointestinal solid tumors, could they be of any clinical significance?

Authors:  Theodore D Tsirlis; George Papastratis; Kyriaki Masselou; Christos Tsigris; Antonis Papachristodoulou; Alkiviadis Kostakis; Nikolaos I Nikiteas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Multimodal preoperative evaluation system in surgical decision making for rectal cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Xiaodong Wang; Donghao Lv; Huan Song; Lei Deng; Qiang Gao; Junhua Wu; Yingyu Shi; Li Li
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.571

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.