Literature DB >> 12924815

Beyond alpha: an empirical examination of the effects of different sources of measurement error on reliability estimates for measures of individual differences constructs.

Frank L Schmidt1, Huy Le, Remus Ilies.   

Abstract

On the basis of an empirical study of measures of constructs from the cognitive domain, the personality domain, and the domain of affective traits, the authors of this study examine the implications of transient measurement error for the measurement of frequently studied individual differences variables. The authors clarify relevant reliability concepts as they relate to transient error and present a procedure for estimating the coefficient of equivalence and stability (L. J. Cronbach, 1947), the only classical reliability coefficient that assesses all 3 major sources of measurement error (random response, transient, and specific factor errors). The authors conclude that transient error exists in all 3 trait domains and is especially large in the domain of affective traits. Their findings indicate that the nearly universal use of the coefficient of equivalence (Cronbach's alpha; L. J. Cronbach, 1951), which fails to assess transient error, leads to overestimates of reliability and undercorrections for biases due to measurement error.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12924815     DOI: 10.1037/1082-989x.8.2.206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  31 in total

1.  The quantification inventory for somatoform syndromes (QUISS): a novel instrument for the assessment of severity.

Authors:  Dirk Wedekind; Borwin Bandelow; Evelyn Fentzahn; Patricia Trümper; Eckart Rüther
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-02       Impact factor: 5.270

2.  Controlling for occasion-specific effects when assessing the test-retest reliability of self-report health questionnaires.

Authors:  Joseph A Olsen; Daniel A Bloch; George J Bloch
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Internal consistency, retest reliability, and their implications for personality scale validity.

Authors:  Robert R McCrae; John E Kurtz; Shinji Yamagata; Antonio Terracciano
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-04-30

Review 4.  Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.

Authors:  Lee Anna Clark; David Watson
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2019-03-21

5.  Getting serious about test-retest reliability: a critique of retest research and some recommendations.

Authors:  Denise F Polit
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  What Sources Contribute to Variance in Observer Ratings? Using Generalizability Theory to Assess Construct Validity of Psychological Measures.

Authors:  Kimberley D Lakes; William T Hoyt
Journal:  Infant Child Dev       Date:  2008-06-01

Review 7.  Dissociation and memory fragmentation in post-traumatic stress disorder: an evaluation of the dissociative encoding hypothesis.

Authors:  Michele Bedard-Gilligan; Lori A Zoellner
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2012-02-21

8.  Assessing the internal consistency and temporal stability of advance directives generated by an interactive, online computer program.

Authors:  Jane R Schubart; Fabian Camacho; Michael J Green; Kimberly A Rush; Benjamin H Levi
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.568

9.  An Application of Reliability Estimation in Longitudinal Designs Through Modeling Item-Specific Error Variance.

Authors:  Georgios D Sideridis; Ioannis Tsaousis; Abdullah Al-Sadaawi
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 2.821

10.  A meta-analysis of work-family conflict and social support.

Authors:  Kimberly A French; Soner Dumani; Tammy D Allen; Kristen M Shockley
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 17.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.