Literature DB >> 12924569

Quantitative structure-activity relationship methods: perspectives on drug discovery and toxicology.

Roger Perkins1, Hong Fang, Weida Tong, William J Welsh.   

Abstract

Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) attempt to correlate chemical structure with activity using statistical approaches. The QSAR models are useful for various purposes including the prediction of activities of untested chemicals. Quantitative structure-activity relationships and other related approaches have attracted broad scientific interest, particularly in the pharmaceutical industry for drug discovery and in toxicology and environmental science for risk assessment. An assortment of new QSAR methods have been developed during the past decade, most of them focused on drug discovery. Besides advancing our fundamental knowledge of QSARs, these scientific efforts have stimulated their application in a wider range of disciplines, such as toxicology, where QSARs have not yet gained full appreciation. In this review, we attempt to summarize the status of QSAR with emphasis on illuminating the utility and limitations of QSAR technology. We will first review two-dimensional (2D) QSAR with a discussion of the availability and appropriate selection of molecular descriptors. We will then proceed to describe three-dimensional (3D) QSAR and key issues associated with this technology, then compare the relative suitability of 2D and 3D QSAR for different applications. Given the recent technological advances in biological research for rapid identification of drug targets, we mention several examples in which QSAR approaches are employed in conjunction with improved knowledge of the structure and function of the target receptor. The review will conclude by discussing statistical validation of QSAR models, a topic that has received sparse attention in recent years despite its critical importance.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12924569     DOI: 10.1897/01-171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  33 in total

Review 1.  In silico pharmacology for drug discovery: methods for virtual ligand screening and profiling.

Authors:  S Ekins; J Mestres; B Testa
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-06-04       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Structure-activity analysis of harmful algae inhibition by congeneric compounds: case studies of fatty acids and thiazolidinediones.

Authors:  Haomin Huang; Xi Xiao; Jiyan Shi; Yingxu Chen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  In Silico Studies Targeting G-protein Coupled Receptors for Drug Research Against Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Agostinho Lemos; Rita Melo; Antonio Jose Preto; Jose Guilherme Almeida; Irina Sousa Moreira; Maria Natalia Dias Soeiro Cordeiro
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 7.363

4.  Molecular fingerprint-based artificial neural networks QSAR for ligand biological activity predictions.

Authors:  Kyaw-Zeyar Myint; Lirong Wang; Qin Tong; Xiang-Qun Xie
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Molecular docking and 3D-quantitative structure activity relationship analyses of peptidyl vinyl sulfones: Plasmodium Falciparum cysteine proteases inhibitors.

Authors:  Cátia Teixeira; José R B Gomes; Thierry Couesnon; Paula Gomes
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2011-07-24       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  New public QSAR model for carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Natalja Fjodorova; Marjan Vracko; Marjana Novic; Alessandra Roncaglioni; Emilio Benfenati
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 7.  Recent advances in fragment-based QSAR and multi-dimensional QSAR methods.

Authors:  Kyaw Zeyar Myint; Xiang-Qun Xie
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Molecular docking and QSAR of aplyronine A and analogues: potent inhibitors of actin.

Authors:  Abrar Hussain; James L Melville; Jonathan D Hirst
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Improving drug response prediction by integrating multiple data sources: matrix factorization, kernel and network-based approaches.

Authors:  Betül Güvenç Paltun; Hiroshi Mamitsuka; Samuel Kaski
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 11.622

10.  Effect of N-(2-aminoethyl) ethanolamine on hypertrophic scarring changes in vitro: Finding novel anti-fibrotic therapies.

Authors:  Zhenping Chen; Jianhua Gu; Amina El Ayadi; Andres F Oberhauser; Jia Zhou; Linda E Sousse; Celeste C Finnerty; David N Herndon; Paul J Boor
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 4.219

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.