Literature DB >> 12923673

[Validation of the German Mainz Pain Staging System in different pain syndromes].

J Frettlöh1, C Maier, H Gockel, M Hüppe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our study was carried out to clarify whether differences in pain intensity,pain-related disability,depression and quality of life change with respect to the stage of chronicity of the Mainz Pain Staging Study (MPSS) in different pain syndromes. Keywords.
METHODS: All patients with an initial pain clinic consultation from July 2000 to July 2001 and suffering from four major pain syndromes ("headache", "neuropathic pain", "back pain" or "muscle and joint pain") were included. Indicators of validity were several self-rating scales from the German pain questionnaire of the German Chapter of the International Association for the Study of Pain (DGSS). Patient data were collected using QUAST, a database environment specifically developed for documentation and quality assurance in pain therapy. An assessment was made for each of the four major diagnoses to determine whether patients in the three chronicity stages differed in their psychometric test results. In addition,the four diagnosis groups were tested for differences from one another.
RESULTS: A total of 862 patient charts with documented pain syndromes and MPSS were extracted and analyzed. The extent of the subjective psychosocial stress and disability increased in all diagnosis groups and was correlated with the chronicity stage. The proportion of patients with an indication of clinically relevant depression (ADS score >23) increased with chronicity regardless of the pain diagnosis. The four main diagnosis groups differed with respect to the chronicity stage according to MPSS (P<0.001), with headache patients being classified predominantly as stage I. Patients with an additional pain diagnosis had a higher chronicity stage (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Our results underline the validity of the MPSS for the four diagnosis groups examined; however, pain diagnosis must be controlled in all studies using chronicity stage as an independent variable, e.g., therapy studies. For optimal results physicians must closely follow the test instructions of the MPSS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12923673     DOI: 10.1007/s00482-003-0227-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  31 in total

1.  [A new look at chronic pain].

Authors:  I Gralow; E Althaus
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Pain assessment according to the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain classification in patients with spinal cord injury referred to a multidisciplinary pain center.

Authors:  S Mahnig; G Landmann; L Stockinger; E Opsommer
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  [Severity of chronic back pain. Assessment with the Mainz Pain Staging System].

Authors:  D Michalski; A Hinz
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  [Success of treatment in higher stages of pain chronification as well? An evaluation of the Mainz pain staging system based on the QUAST-analysis sample].

Authors:  M Hüppe; C Maier; H Gockel; M Zenz; J Frettlöh
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  [Efficacy of epidural steroid injections for chronic lumbar pain syndromes without neurological deficits. A randomized, double blind study as part of a multimodal treatment concept].

Authors:  K Niemier; M Schindler; T Volk; K Baum; B Wolf; J Eberitsch; W Seidel
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  [Rehabilitation of non-specific low back pain. Results of a multidisciplinary in-patient program].

Authors:  E Wagner; B Ehrenhofer; E Lackerbauer; U Pawelak; W Siegmeth
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 7.  [Options for pain therapy of urologic chronic pelvic pain syndrome (UCPPS)].

Authors:  O Moormann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Practical assessment in patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Mohammad Keilani; Andrew J Haig; Richard Crevenna
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2015-12-09

9.  [Staging of pain in patients with chronic low back pain in inpatient rehabilitation: validity of the Mainz Pain Staging System of pain chronification].

Authors:  P Hampel; M F Moergel
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.107

10.  [Psychosocial factors in chronic low back pain in orthopaedic inpatient rehabilitation. An analysis using the axes of the Mainz Pain Staging System].

Authors:  L Tlach; P Hampel
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.