Literature DB >> 12923474

Multimodality monitoring of transcranial electric motor and somatosensory-evoked potentials during surgical correction of spinal deformity in patients with cerebral palsy and other neuromuscular disorders.

Sabina DiCindio1, Mary Theroux, Suken Shah, Freeman Miller, Kirk Dabney, Robert P Brislin, Daniel Schwartz.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This prospective, descriptive study determined the reliability of transcranial electric motor and posterior tibial nerve somatosensory-evoked potentials in children with neuromuscular scoliosis.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the applicability of transcranial electric motor and posterior tibial nerve somatosensory-evoked potentials during surgical correction of neuromuscular scoliosis, particularly with cerebral palsy-related deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: During corrective spinal surgery for neuromuscular scoliosis, intraoperative multimodality spinal cord monitoring is recommended. There exist conflicting, retrospective studies regarding the reliability of spinal cord monitoring in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis.
METHODS: Transcranial electric motor potentials and posterior tibial nerve somatosensory-evoked potentials were monitored in all patients presenting for spinal fusion between 2000 and 2001. Anesthesia was standardized for all patients.
RESULTS: There were 68 patients subdivided into two subject groups. Group I consisted of 39 patients with neuromuscular scoliosis associated with cerebral palsy, and Group II consisted of 29 children with neuromuscular scoliosis due to a disease process other than cerebral palsy. Five of the 68 patients had significant amplitude changes in 1 or both monitoring methods during surgery relative to baseline. Of these, one had permanent neurologic deficit despite standard intervention. Somatosensory-evoked potentials were monitored successfully in 82% of the cerebral palsy and 86% of the noncerebral palsy patients. Transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials, on the other hand, were monitorable in 63% of patients with mild or moderate degrees of cerebral palsy and 39% of those with severe involvement. Eighty-six percent of those with noncerebral palsy-related neuromuscular scoliosis had recordable motor-evoked potentials at baseline.
CONCLUSION: Both transcranial electric motor and posterior tibial nerve somatosensory-evoked potentials can be monitored reliably in most patients with neuromuscular scoliosis. Those with severe cerebral palsy present the greatest challenge to successful neurophysiologic monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12923474     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083202.62956.A8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative neurophysiology in posterior fossa tumor surgery in children.

Authors:  Francesco Sala; Angela Coppola; Vincenzo Tramontano
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Intraoperative neurophysiology of the motor system in children: a tailored approach.

Authors:  Francesco Sala; Paolo Manganotti; Stefan Grossauer; Vincenzo Tramontanto; Carlo Mazza; Massimo Gerosa
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Surgeon-driven neurophysiologic monitoring in a spinal surgery population.

Authors:  Michael Pickell; Stephen M Mann; Rajesh Chakravertty; Daniel P Borschneck
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09

4.  Intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory (SSEPs) and transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials (tce-MEPs) during surgical correction of neuromuscular scoliosis in patients with central or peripheral nervous system diseases.

Authors:  F Pastorelli; M Di Silvestre; F Vommaro; E Maredi; A Morigi; M R Bacchin; S Bonarelli; R Plasmati; R Michelucci; T Greggi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Intraoperative spinal cord monitoring during the surgical correction of scoliosis due to cerebral palsy and other neuromuscular disorders.

Authors:  T C Hammett; B Boreham; N A Quraishi; S M H Mehdian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Current approach on spinal cord monitoring: the point of view of the neurologist, the anesthesiologist and the spine surgeon.

Authors:  Thomas N Pajewski; Vincent Arlet; Lawrence H Phillips
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring in children with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Akash J Patel; Satish Agadi; Jonathan G Thomas; Robert J Schmidt; Steven W Hwang; Daniel H Fulkerson; Chris D Glover; Andrew Jea
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Do intra-operative neurophysiological changes predict functional outcome following decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis? A prospective study.

Authors:  Krzysztof Piasecki; Gerit Kulik; Katarzyna Pierzchala; Etienne Pralong; Prashanth J Rao; Constantin Schizas
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

9.  Multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring in corrective surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Evaluation of 354 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Vishal K Kundnani; Lisa Zhu; Hh Tak; Hk Wong
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Surgical treatment and intraoperative spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis associated with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a case report.

Authors:  Daisuke Kudo; Naohisa Miyakoshi; Michio Hongo; Yuji Kasukawa; Yoshinori Ishikawa; Akiko Misawa; Yoichi Shimada
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.384

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.