Literature DB >> 12923290

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of thiopurine methyltransferase polymorphism screening by polymerase chain reaction for treatment with azathioprine in Korea.

K-T Oh1, A H Anis, S-C Bae.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the value of genotype-based dosing by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based polymorphism screening in terms of cost-effectiveness for treatment with azathioprine in Korea.
METHODS: Decision analysis was employed to compare a genotype-based dosing strategy with the conventional weight-based dosing strategy using a hypothetical cohort composed of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus patients. The time horizon was set up as 1 yr. Direct medical costs were used. Data used were obtained from previous reports, except for PCR and admission costs, which were from real cases. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from a societal perspective. Outcomes were measured as a total expected cost and an incremental cost-effective ratio.
RESULTS: In the base case model, total expected cost and the probability of not dropping out owing to serious adverse events of the conventional weight-based dosing and the genotype-based dosing strategy were 1339 x 10(3) Korean won (1,117 US dollars) and 1109 x 10(3) Korean won (926 US dollars), and 97.06 and 99.90%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our model suggests that a genotype-based dosing strategy through PCR-based thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) polymorphism screening is less costly and more effective than the conventional weight-based dosing strategy in Korea, as it was associated with a marked reduction in the number of serious adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12923290     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  21 in total

1.  Common misconceptions about 5-aminosalicylates and thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Javier P Gisbert; María Chaparro; Fernando Gomollón
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Cost effectiveness of pharmacogenomics: a critical and systematic review.

Authors:  William B Wong; Josh J Carlson; Rahber Thariani; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Modeling the Outcome of Systematic TPMT Genotyping or Phenotyping Before Azathioprine Prescription: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Zarca; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski; Marie-Anne Loriot; Gilles Chatellier; Nicolas Pallet
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  Thiopurine methyltransferase screening before azathioprine therapy.

Authors:  V Gauba; M Saldanha; C Vize; G M Saleh
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Pharmacoeconomic analyses of azathioprine, methotrexate and prospective pharmacogenetic testing for the management of inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Virginia L Priest; Evan J Begg; Sharon J Gardiner; Christopher M A Frampton; Richard B Gearry; Murray L Barclay; David W J Clark; Paul Hansen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Development and implementation of a pharmacist-managed clinical pharmacogenetics service.

Authors:  Kristine R Crews; Shane J Cross; John N McCormick; Donald K Baker; Alejandro R Molinelli; Richard Mullins; Mary V Relling; James M Hoffman
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 7.  Genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolising enzymes and drug transporters in the chemotherapeutic treatment of cancer.

Authors:  Tessa M Bosch; Irma Meijerman; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) activity is better determined by biochemical assay versus genotyping in the Jewish population.

Authors:  Yair Kasirer; Rephael Mevorach; Paul Renbaum; Nurit Algur; Devora Soiferman; Rachel Beeri; Yelana Rachman; Reeval Segel; Dan Turner
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Pharmacoeconomic evaluations of pharmacogenetic and genomic screening programmes: a systematic review on content and adherence to guidelines.

Authors:  Stefan Vegter; Cornelis Boersma; Mark Rozenbaum; Bob Wilffert; Gerjan Navis; Maarten J Postma
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Modeling the impact of genetic screening technologies on healthcare: theoretical model for asthma in children.

Authors:  Emma Gutiérrez de Mesa; Ignacio Hidalgo; Panayotis Christidis; Juan Carlos Ciscar; Eva Vegas; Dolores Ibarreta
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.074

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.