K-T Oh1, A H Anis, S-C Bae. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Hanyang University College of Medicine and the Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Hanyang University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the value of genotype-based dosing by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based polymorphism screening in terms of cost-effectiveness for treatment with azathioprine in Korea. METHODS: Decision analysis was employed to compare a genotype-based dosing strategy with the conventional weight-based dosing strategy using a hypothetical cohort composed of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus patients. The time horizon was set up as 1 yr. Direct medical costs were used. Data used were obtained from previous reports, except for PCR and admission costs, which were from real cases. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from a societal perspective. Outcomes were measured as a total expected cost and an incremental cost-effective ratio. RESULTS: In the base case model, total expected cost and the probability of not dropping out owing to serious adverse events of the conventional weight-based dosing and the genotype-based dosing strategy were 1339 x 10(3) Korean won (1,117 US dollars) and 1109 x 10(3) Korean won (926 US dollars), and 97.06 and 99.90%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our model suggests that a genotype-based dosing strategy through PCR-based thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) polymorphism screening is less costly and more effective than the conventional weight-based dosing strategy in Korea, as it was associated with a marked reduction in the number of serious adverse events.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the value of genotype-based dosing by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based polymorphism screening in terms of cost-effectiveness for treatment with azathioprine in Korea. METHODS: Decision analysis was employed to compare a genotype-based dosing strategy with the conventional weight-based dosing strategy using a hypothetical cohort composed of rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosuspatients. The time horizon was set up as 1 yr. Direct medical costs were used. Data used were obtained from previous reports, except for PCR and admission costs, which were from real cases. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from a societal perspective. Outcomes were measured as a total expected cost and an incremental cost-effective ratio. RESULTS: In the base case model, total expected cost and the probability of not dropping out owing to serious adverse events of the conventional weight-based dosing and the genotype-based dosing strategy were 1339 x 10(3) Korean won (1,117 US dollars) and 1109 x 10(3) Korean won (926 US dollars), and 97.06 and 99.90%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our model suggests that a genotype-based dosing strategy through PCR-based thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) polymorphism screening is less costly and more effective than the conventional weight-based dosing strategy in Korea, as it was associated with a marked reduction in the number of serious adverse events.
Authors: Virginia L Priest; Evan J Begg; Sharon J Gardiner; Christopher M A Frampton; Richard B Gearry; Murray L Barclay; David W J Clark; Paul Hansen Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2006 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Kristine R Crews; Shane J Cross; John N McCormick; Donald K Baker; Alejandro R Molinelli; Richard Mullins; Mary V Relling; James M Hoffman Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2011-01-15 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: Emma Gutiérrez de Mesa; Ignacio Hidalgo; Panayotis Christidis; Juan Carlos Ciscar; Eva Vegas; Dolores Ibarreta Journal: Mol Diagn Ther Date: 2007 Impact factor: 4.074