Literature DB >> 12923283

A brief screening tool for knee pain in primary care (KNEST). 2. Results from a survey in the general population aged 50 and over.

C Jinks1, K Jordan, B N Ong, P Croft.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use a brief screening tool to identify knee pain (all knee pain, non-chronic and chronic knee pain) and associated health-care use in the general population aged 50 yr and over.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was mailed to 8995 individuals registered with three general practices in North Staffordshire, UK. The questionnaire included a Knee Pain Screening Tool (KNEST), the Short Form 36 (SF36), demographic questions and, for those who reported knee pain, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).
RESULTS: The survey achieved a 77% response. The 12-month period prevalence of all knee pain was 46.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 45.6%, 48.0%]. Figures for non-chronic knee pain (pain of less than 3 months duration) and chronic knee pain (pain of more than 3 months duration) were 21.5% (95% CI 20.5%, 22.5%) and 25.3% (95% CI 24.3%, 26.4%) respectively. An estimated 6% of the older population had non-chronic but severe knee pain or disability. Thirty-three per cent of all knee pain sufferers had consulted their general practitioner (GP) about their symptom in the last year. This included 34% of those with non-chronic but severe knee pain or disability and 56% of those with chronic and severe knee pain or disability. The use of private treatments or services for knee pain was minimal. A third of those with chronic and severe knee pain or disability had not used any services (including GP) in the last year.
CONCLUSIONS: The KNEST is a simple tool for the identification of individuals with knee pain and their health-care use. Focusing only on chronic knee pain will underestimate the total need and demand for health-care in knee pain sufferers in the general older population, as non-chronic as well as chronic knee pain has a significant impact on people's lives and on their use of primary health-care. The KNEST, when combined with the WOMAC, identifies population groups who have potentially diverse health-care needs and who might benefit from effective health-care. These data can be used alongside evidence on effective treatments by service planners when considering needs for the care of older adults in primary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12923283     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  73 in total

1.  Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies.

Authors:  Yaron S Brin; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Lawrence Joseph; David J Zukor; John Antoniou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A prospective study of the consulting behaviour of older people with knee pain.

Authors:  Kelvin Jordan; Clare Jinks; Peter Croft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Does age modify the relationship between morbidity severity and physical health in English and Dutch family practice populations?

Authors:  Umesh T Kadam; Francois G Schellevis; Martyn Lewis; Danielle A W M van der Windt; Henrica C W de Vet; Lex M Bouter; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Correlation of Uptake Patterns on Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography (SPECT/CT) and Treatment Response in Patients with Knee Pain.

Authors:  Geon Koh; Kyung Hoon Hwang; Haejun Lee; Seog Gyun Kim; Beom Koo Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-10-26

5.  Mapping tibiofemoral gonarthrosis: an MRI analysis of non-traumatic knee cartilage defects.

Authors:  D S Evangelopoulos; M Huesler; S S Ahmad; E Aghayev; M Neukamp; C Röder; A Exadaktylos; H Bonel; S Kohl
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  "Well, it's nobody's responsibility but my own." A qualitative study to explore views about the determinants of health and prevention of knee pain in older adults.

Authors:  Clare Jinks; Bie Nio Ong; Tracey O'Neill
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Knee extensor strength does not protect against incident knee symptoms at 30 months in the multicenter knee osteoarthritis (MOST) cohort.

Authors:  Neil A Segal; James C Torner; David T Felson; Jingbo Niu; Leena Sharma; Cora E Lewis; Michael Nevitt
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.298

8.  Comparing the performance of the EQ-5D and SF-6D when measuring the benefits of alleviating knee pain.

Authors:  Garry R Barton; Tracey H Sach; Anthony J Avery; Michael Doherty; Claire Jenkinson; Kenneth R Muir
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2009-07-17

9.  When knee pain becomes severe: a nested case-control analysis in community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  George Peat; Elaine Thomas
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  Lifestyle interventions for knee pain in overweight and obese adults aged > or = 45: economic evaluation of randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Garry R Barton; Tracey H Sach; Claire Jenkinson; Michael Doherty; Anthony J Avery; Kenneth R Muir
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-08-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.