Literature DB >> 12921413

Is there a magnitude effect in tipping?

Leonard Green1, Joel Myerson, Rachel Schneider.   

Abstract

The present study examined nearly 1,000 tips recorded for two taxicabs, two hair salons, and two restaurants. In each of the six cases, amount of tip increased linearly as a function of the amount of the bill. Contrary to standard microeconomic theory, there was a magnitude effect in that as the amount of the bill increased, the percent tip tended to decrease. The present results extend the findings of Chapman and Winquist (1998), obtained using hypothetical scenarios, to real-world tipping behavior. Chapman and Winquist argued that a magnitude effect in tipping reflects the shape of the utility function for money. We suggest, however, that the magnitude effect may be the mathematical consequence of replotting the fundamental relationship between tip and bill amounts in terms of percent tip, given that the observed linear relation between tip and bill amounts has a positive intercept. We suggest further that the positive intercept arises because a tip represents a judgment as to what constitutes a fair or equitable wage, and part of what constitutes a fair wage is independent of the amount of the bill, reflecting compensation for simply being there when needed. The present account implies that different explanations may be needed for magnitude effects observed in different domains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12921413     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  2 in total

1.  Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes.

Authors:  L Green; J Myerson; P Ostaszewski
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward.

Authors:  L Green; J Myerson; E McFadden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09
  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Reward contrast in delay and probability discounting.

Authors:  Zhijie Dai; Randolph C Grace; Simon Kemp
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.986

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.