Literature DB >> 12919758

A needleless closed system device (CLAVE) protects from intravascular catheter tip and hub colonization: a prospective randomized study.

E Bouza1, P Muñoz, J López-Rodríguez, M Jesús Pérez, C Rincón, P Martín Rabadán, C Sánchez, E Bastida.   

Abstract

Hub colonization and subsequent intraluminal progression due to frequent opening and manipulation of intravenous systems is the cause of many catheter-related infections (CRI). A prospective, comparative, randomized study was performed to assess a new closed-needleless hub device (CLAVE) compared with conventional open systems (COS). End-points were hub and skin colonization, catheter tip colonization, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) and number of accidental needlesticks. All cultures were processed following standard semiquantitative microbiological techniques. The study involved patients who underwent heart surgery over an 11-month period in a post-surgical ICU. During the study period, 352 patients underwent major heart surgery and 1774 catheters were inserted. Overall, 865 catheters in 178 patients were allocated to the CLAVE system and 909 catheters in 174 patients to COS. The groups were similar regarding underlying conditions and risk factors for infection. Comparison of endpoint results in CLAVE and COS groups was as follows: incidence density per 1000 catheter-days of tip colonization: 59.2 versus 83.6 (P=0.003); of hub colonization: 7.56 versus 24.66 (P=0.0017); of skin colonization: 41.5 versus 58.9 (P=0.038); and of CRBSI 3.78 versus 5.89 (P=0.4). There was one accidental needlestick and one catheter-related prosthetic endocarditis in the COS group. Multivariate analysis showed that CLAVE use was an independent protective factor for tip colonization. CLAVE offered significant protection from catheter-tip and hub colonization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12919758     DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00136-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  9 in total

1.  Cultures of Needleless Connectors Are Useful for Ruling Out Central Venous Catheter Colonization.

Authors:  María Guembe; María Jesús Pérez-Granda; Raquel Cruces; Pablo Martín-Rabadán; Emilio Bouza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Needleless closed system does not reduce central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Mitsuru Ishizuka; Hitoshi Nagata; Kazutoshi Takagi; Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar

3.  A Cost Saving and Waste Minimization Study About Handling of the Antineoplastic Agents.

Authors:  Metin Deniz Karakoç
Journal:  Turk J Pharm Sci       Date:  2017-11-20

Review 4.  Disinfection of Needleless Connector Hubs: Clinical Evidence Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nancy L Moureau; Julie Flynn
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2015-05-14

5.  In vitro study on the disinfectability of two split-septum needle-free connection devices using different disinfection procedures.

Authors:  Steffen Engelhart; Martin Exner; Arne Simon
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2015-12-09

6.  Vascular catheter colonization: surveillance based on culture of needleless connectors.

Authors:  María Jesús Pérez-Granda; María Guembe; Raquel Cruces; Emilio Bouza
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  How much is red blood cell fragmentation increased by the use of closed luer lock access devices on catheter hubs?

Authors:  Sunny Eloot; Jean-Yves De Vos; Remi Hombrouckx
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2008-09-01

8.  The Impact of Open versus Closed Catheter Access System of Central Venous Catheter on Infection Prevention in Critically Ill Patients: A Comparative Evaluation.

Authors:  Davinder Kaur; Surinder Jaspal; Sukhminderjit Singh Bajwa
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2020-11-07

9.  Assessment of central venous catheter colonization using surveillance culture of withdrawn connectors and insertion site skin.

Authors:  María Jesús Pérez-Granda; María Guembe; Raquel Cruces; José María Barrio; Emilio Bouza
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 9.097

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.