Literature DB >> 12919266

Living with the Ilizarov frame: adolescent perceptions.

Linda Martin1, Michael Farrell, Karina Lambrenos, Duria Nayagam.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Ilizarov technique has become an established method in the treatment of children with serious skeletal disorders. Whilst the technique is acknowledged for solving difficult conditions, the application of the external fixator marks the beginning of an arduous treatment programme. Research has suggested that undergoing such treatment can negatively impact upon the physical and psychological well-being of the young person. Yet limitations in research design reduce the usefulness of the findings, given in that most of the previous studies have used retrospective, quantitative data collection approaches, often with a heterogeneous sample population. We wished to gain a richer insight into the experiences of adolescents living with the frame by drawing on both qualitative and quantitative approaches. AIMS: To explore adolescents' perceptions of the anticipated and actual impact of the Ilizarov frame on aspects of daily activity.
DESIGN: A mixed-method approach, using a prospective and longitudinal study design.
METHOD: Fifteen adolescents undergoing the Ilizarov treatment were contacted at several predetermined time-points during the course of their treatment to share their perceptions of living with the frame. At several of these points semi-structured interviews were used to ascertain their perceptions, whilst quantitative data were gained at all time-points by adolescents completing a range of psychometric measures.
FINDINGS: Adolescents found that life with the frame was not as bad as anticipated, and they adopted a pragmatic approach, appreciating that this was something they 'just had to get through'. Peers had a substantial role in supporting their friend to adjust and cope with the frame. Psychometric scores were largely within normal limits.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that, while the Ilizarov treatment is demanding for adolescents, it is one that they can tolerate without sustained adverse psychological impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12919266     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02745.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  9 in total

1.  Quality of life in patients with varus gonarthrosis treated with high tibial osteotomy using the circular external fixator.

Authors:  Taner Gunes; Mehmet Erdem; Bora Bostan; Kursad Yeniel; Cengiz Sen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Supporting limb reconstruction patients: a fine-wire circular fixator support group.

Authors:  M P Newton Ede; M H A Malik; L Prudhoe; C Miller; S A Khan; R A Wilkes
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Long-term psychosocial functioning after Ilizarov limb lengthening during childhood.

Authors:  Judith M Moraal; Alda Elzinga-Plomp; Marian J Jongmans; Peter M van Roermund; Petra E Flikweert; René M Castelein; Gerben Sinnema
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Complex Tibial Shaft Fractures in Children Involving the Distal Physis Managed with the Ilizarov Method.

Authors:  Gareth P Rogers; Hiang B Tan; Patrick Foster; Paul Harwood
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2019 Jan-Apr

5.  Factors influencing self-care in outpatients with external fixation in China.

Authors:  Jun Xing; Ning Sun; Laiyou Li; Dongmei Lv; Shuling Geng; Yuqian Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Assessment of the quality of life in patients with varying degrees of equalization of lower limb length discrepancy treated with Ilizarov method.

Authors:  Łukasz Pawik; Malwina Pawik; Zdzisława Wrzosek; Felicja Fink-Lwow; Piotr Morasiewicz
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  What matters to children with lower limb deformities: an international qualitative study guiding the development of a new patient-reported outcome measure.

Authors:  Harpreet Chhina; Anne F Klassen; Jacek A Kopec; John Oliffe; Christopher Iobst; Noemi Dahan-Oliel; Aditya Aggarwal; Tim Nunn; Anthony P Cooper
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2021-04-01

8.  Quality of life of children during distraction osteogenesis: a comparison between intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails and external fixators.

Authors:  Mohamed Hafez; Nicolas Nicolaou; Amaka Offiah; Bright Offorha; Stephen Giles; Sanjeev Madan; James A Fernandes
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.479

9.  Patient-reported outcomes following treatment of tibial non-union with circular frames.

Authors:  P Fenton; D Bose
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2014-02-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.