Literature DB >> 1291849

To stay or not to stay: are fears about shorter postnatal hospital stays justified?

R Small, J Lumley, S Brown.   

Abstract

Common concerns raised during a Ministerial Review of Birthing Services in Victoria, Australia about the potential detrimental effects of shorter hospital stays after birth were examined in a study of women's actual experiences of and opinions about their hospital stays. Just under one in four women left hospital within five days of the birth, with the greater majority staying five days or more. Satisfaction with length of stay was high in the sample, with 82% of women feeling their stay had been about right, 11% feeling it had been too long and only 7% of women feeling their stay had been too short. A number of the concerns about the consequences of shorter lengths of stay were not borne out. Women who left hospital earlier than the traditional 5-7 day stay were not less likely to breast feed, nor were they more likely to be depressed 8-9 months after the birth. They were also much more likely to feel confident about looking after their baby when they went home than women who stayed five days or more. Implications for further research and for policy development concerning length of stay are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1291849     DOI: 10.1016/s0266-6138(05)80003-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  2 in total

1.  Psychosocial risk factors to major depression after childbirth.

Authors:  Philip Boyce; Anthea Hickey
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Monitoring systems to evaluate the quality of perinatal care.

Authors:  J Lumley
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1995
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.