Literature DB >> 12918047

Nanoscale in vivo evaluation of the stiffness of Drosophila melanogaster integument during development.

M Kohane1, A Daugela, H Kutomi, L Charlson, A Wyrobek, J Wyrobek.   

Abstract

A quasistatic nanoindentation technique, enhanced by scanning probe microscopy, was used to measure cuticle stiffness of live Drosophila melanogaster during its larval, pupal, and early adult development in vivo. Stiffness was defined as the reduced elastic modulus (E(r)), which is a material property related to the elastic modulus. E(r) was measured at the local contact while indenting the live sample at a constant loading rate using a spherical tip. E(r) was derived from the resultant force-displacement curves. Insect cuticle exhibits viscoelastic behavior. Constant loading rate quasistatic measurements were used so that the effects of viscosity and contact force adhesion introduced systematic measurement effects. E(r) values were as follows: larvae, mean (SE), 0.39 (0.01) MPa; the puparium without evidence of adult structures 15.43 (1.78) MPa; and the adult, measured in the puparium at the completion of metamorphosis, 4.37 (0.31) MPa. Thus, as expected, the puparium and adult cuticle were very much stiffer than larval cuticle. Results also indicated stiffness variation that related to developmental events. This study has shown that this quasistatic nanoindentation-scanning probe microscopy approach is a suitable method for analyzing live biological samples. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 66A: 633-642, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12918047     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.10028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  4 in total

1.  Nanoindentation investigation of the stress exponent for the creep of dung beetle (Copris ochus Motschulsky) cuticle.

Authors:  Zhijun Zhang; Honglei Jia; Jiyu Sun; Jin Tong
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.269

2.  Elastic modulus of tree frog adhesive toe pads.

Authors:  W Jon P Barnes; Pablo J Perez Goodwyn; Mohsen Nokhbatolfoghahai; Stanislav N Gorb
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Material structure, stiffness, and adhesion: why attachment pads of the grasshopper (Tettigonia viridissima) adhere more strongly than those of the locust (Locusta migratoria) (Insecta: Orthoptera).

Authors:  Pablo Perez Goodwyn; Andrei Peressadko; Heinz Schwarz; Victoria Kastner; Stanislav Gorb
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Forces to pierce cuticle of tarsi and material properties determined by nanoindentation: The Achilles' heel of bed bugs.

Authors:  Jorge Bustamante; Jason F Panzarino; Timothy J Rupert; Catherine Loudon
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 2.422

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.